[ad_1]
The microbiologist reiterates his position on the drug, which has sparked several controversies in recent days: “As is known at this time, I would not do it. The defects are in the hasty approval process.”
“I have not changed my position: I repeat that because of the knowledge we have today I would not get the vaccine. If the data were made public and the scientific community validated its validity, it would, I have no doubt about that ”. Microbiologist Andrea Crisanti, who spoke with Good Morning On Sky TG24, he reaffirms his position after the controversy over his words about the vaccine. “The flaws are in the hasty process for the approval of the drug,” reiterated the professor from the University of Padua. And on the obligatory nature or not of the vaccine, he explains: “There is no requirement that a vaccine approved with a rushed procedure be obligatory” (CORONAVIRUS, LIVE UPDATES – THE SPECIAL).
“I am in favor of the vaccine but I ask for maximum transparency”
“I spoke at a conference with an audience mainly interested in science – said Crisanti – and I frankly expressed what many scientists around the world think, I do not understand why this debate can be easily done in England, in the USA and here, on the other hand, there should be an immediate discussion between who is in favor of the vaccine and who is not. I am in favor of the vaccine, I only ask for maximum transparency and I do not believe that the vaccine is a sacred object, that’s all ” .
“It is a question of transparency”
read also
Covid, Cts against Crisanti’s words about the vaccine: “Unacceptable”
Crisanti explains his statements by underlining that “it is a matter of transparency: if you want to generate trust, you have to be transparent. The more scientists complain about the lack of information and the more they demand it, the more people trust “, adds the professor.” Is it possible that this mechanism is not understood? Transparency generates an invaluable asset: trust. This outcry that has taken place is absolutely unreasonable, because I have not said that I will not receive the vaccine, but simply that everyone in the scientific community should have access to the raw data. In this way we all get vaccinated, without any fear and without retro-thought ”. Crisanti argues that his words are “provincial controversies” and that “my sentences are common sense”: “I am not the only one who says these things”, emphasizes the microbiologist, “they are thoughts shared by many scientists.”
“Remdesivir is also approved but has significant side effects”
read also
Covid, Hope: “Persuasion is better than vaccine obligation”
Crisanti then warns about what happened with Remdesivir, used in recent months for cures against Covid: “It has been approved, but it is a drug with significant side effects,” underlines the microbiologist. “Now the whole approval procedure is being reviewed: these things need to be done. There are procedures that are accelerated and that inherently have risks.”
“There should be outrage over the many dead”
To the outrage of some awakened by their perplexities, Crisanti responds: “Italians should be angry with those who have allowed a second wave. We should be outraged by the 15 thousand deaths that have occurred since July, not by something as obvious as that. I said. “
Last modified date
