[ad_1]
Gianluigi Paragone
It is not enough to call them governors to think about being in a federal state: Italy has only a strange regionalism that has suffered from both the right and the left to wrest the issue from its political opponent.
I certainly will not go here to recall the genesis of the fifth title reform, I just need to remember that the then center-left proposed it to prevent Bossi from re-allying the League with Berlusconi. We were on the eve of the two thousand regionals. However, Bossi was already negotiating with the Cavaliere his federal reform – the return (another masterpiece …) – and thus passed the fifth title. And it was the beginning of chaos, of constitutional imbalance.
Ultimately, for the regions the misunderstanding of semantic reforms applies: governors, the prime minister, Europe … Even the dpcm are within this formal and substantial short-circuit, in fact they magnify the blame. “Did the governors want to decide? Here it serves them>, says the government. As if it were a kind of fair where whoever shouts the loudest wins the cow. The competition of the Regions in Health is an exclusive matter (mostly organizational) as long as one It is in an ordinary situation but where it is in a situation of “serious danger to the security and safety of the citizen” Article 120 of the Constitution puts the government at the center. The government, always with the Constitution in hand, does not it affects fundamental rights with an administrative act like the dpcm, but now we are all free in the den.
Let’s go further. How to go through the chromatic lottery when we have a super commissioner (Domenico Arcuri) who does not guarantee the total transparency of the documents, idem the cts? It goes without saying that there are doubts of little objectivity, here now everything is an abuse of powers and positions. Inversely proportional to the responsibility they must assume. Does anyone pay for mistakes? No.
If the number of infections with related problems increases in hospitals, the blame cannot be on the behavior of citizens, but on those who should have organized the appropriate response. It has been done? Again, the answer is no. Minister Speranza cannot think that the writing of his book is a trivial setback: the fact that he had time to write a story / testimony with the lunar title “Why will we heal” in the summer means that he wasted time and also that incorrect vision . That pride (with which the book is impregnated) is paid by the citizens. They are reacting with a great sense of responsibility and solidarity, which, however, they do not see in the palaces.
In Milan, the fruit and vegetable market (which is like the agri-food market) has suffered deep suffering: if that world hits its head, it means that the entire supply chain is in trouble. And it wrinkles. In Rimini, a beautiful solidarity initiative saw the merchants in the center turn off the signs and lights of the stores for fifteen minutes as a sign of solidarity with the companions of the bars and restaurants forced to close at 6 in the afternoon; if you close the bars at 6pm, the shops are also empty. And it is harmful to everyone.
Clothing stores will have a terrifying freeze because in addition to the fixed costs, you have to have the payment of goods, warehouses, banks and the competition from e-commerce. In Rimini they turn off the lights for a quarter of an hour to be seen and heard in a peaceful way; Will anyone listen to it or prefer dark cities filled only with places where packages can be picked up? “The soft drink decree is ready,” the government and the majority re-launch. But how can you trust a government that can’t even manage a discount coupon of up to 500 euros for a bike? If you think the crisis will pass with a click, go ahead.
[ad_2]
