Coronavirus, another Fugatti mess. In one day three different versions of the “red zones”. The Democratic Party: “ Come to the House urgently, we no longer understand what the official position is ”



[ad_1]

TRENTO. President Fugatti has accustomed his citizens to the fact that he is capable of contradicting himself several times One day to another. Being alone to the last cases, for example we have having had the considerations on the handling of positive antigens: once said that the control swab with molecular occurred 10 to 14 days while recently explained that it was done in 10 days (HERE THE VIDEOS). Or there were the statements that with the elevators open There was a broken femur, it wouldn’t have been a problem. and instead a few days Ago asked attention to the people of Trentino who walk in the snow that the hospitals are already saturated.

Today, however, it has managed to contradict itself on three occasions, with three different versions, about the sentence regarding the government measures announced on the next “red zones.” A as president of the Pat in the provincial council, one of protagonist Facebook direct in front of his fellow citizensand one of Governor of the Northern League that in the end he can only keep what he says Salvini (who today, for the record, attacked the government in the Senate saying: ”Don’t steal Christmas from children. ”).

“We ask for clarity for the Council and above all for the citizens of Trentino,” said the Democratic party leader Sara Ferrari in the House tonight to President Kaswalder asking him to locate President Fugatti and see if he can return to the council to further explain and clarify his positionand therefore from the Province, towards of the hypothesis of greater restrictions due to the difficult situation in Trentino.

” The directors – said Ferrari – have in fact said puzzled by the contradictory position expressed today by President Fugatti. In fact, we record that At the same time there is a president of the province of Fugatti who this morning said openly in the classroom that he had expressed a favorable opinion at the conference of the State Regions. to the establishment of a national red zone from December 24 to January 6, as well as not having expressed opposition to the hypothesis put forward by some regions to bring this closure forward to next weekend. Statements subsequently confirmed by himself to the press. ” And actually that was it all the media had reported.

Somebody like the Ansa I had interpreted it as very well in the early closing (but also the Trentino that he titled: Fugatti: ” Yes ​​to the red zone. Better start next week ‘‘), someone else, like us, had just said that regarding the confinement from 24 from Fugatti: ” There is a yes from the province of Trento. We are also not opposed to advancing this measure one week. ”.

” In the afternoon – Ferrari continues – the president, Faced with the forced interpretations of his non-opposition to anticipation, he had to specify that he did not give a favorable opinion but that awaits government decisions, recognizing the worrying situation in Trentino. This evidently another Fugatti in the Northern League and non-institutional role as president of the province, signed, together with the governors of Veneto, Umbria and Lombardy and the political leader Salvini, the mandate to the president of Friuli Venezia Giulia Fedriga, to negotiate with the government to avoid these restrictions, answering the same hypothesis of a national red zone that contrasts with regional differences. In this point neither the councilors nor perhaps the people of Trentino understand what the true institutional position is that the province of Trento intends to address this delicate issue and if party discipline conditions decisions. ”

[ad_2]