[ad_1]
It’s making people argue the cancellation of the second goal that Federico Chiesa he did it over the course of Juventus-Atalanta, challenge from the rhythms of the Champions, which ended with a draw and a goal from each side. The question that many fans have asked is whether the decision made by referee Duties was correct or not. But it is on the lips of the referee who explained to the author of the goal that “it would not have been sporting” for a campaign against the same Juve player to have been unleashed, many times the object of criticism for alleged drills, and by many anti Juventus yesterday for the penalty episode then missed by Cristiano Ronaldo.
Summing up what happened: the goalkeeper Gollini, yesterday stratospheric in at least a couple of situations, at the beginning of the second half, it comes out Morata released on the net. The Juventus forward tries the diagonal to anticipate the intervention and hits the Atalanta number one in the face, who remains on the ground after the strong and close shot of the Juventus forward.
As the action unfolds, Chiesa rushes to jump on the ball and score. However, this goal is immediately annulled by the referee, who explains to the author of the net that “it would not have been sporting”.
What does the regulation say? To the rule 5 it reads: “After a violent shot or a fortuitous collision, the goalkeeper is so affected that he cannot try to avoid scoring a goal. How should the referee rule? If the ball immediately crosses the goal line, it scores the goal. Otherwise, he will interrupt the game and restart it with his own serve, after having assisted the goalkeeper.”.
In the interpretation of this rule, obviously the positions are different: certainly if Morata’s shot had ended on goal, the goal would have been validated. But, beyond the assessments that can be made, at Juve the main rule is not to look for excuses.
