[ad_1]
“Yes, we violate international law, but in a very specific and limited way”: the admission of the British Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Brendon Lewis, marks a new tear in the Brexi and was greeted with disbelief in Brussels, while the eighth round of negotiations aimed to regulate future relations between the‘European Union and the Britain. A negotiation that evidently starts on a sharp rise, after the escalation of controversy between the parties after the ultimatum of the prime minister two days ago Boris Johnson, that threatens a No deal if no agreement is reached before October 15.
The fact is that the news from London seems to aim above all at destabilizing the counterpart. Before“Bill of the internal market” (which will be presented on Friday in Westminster, which is not yet known when he should be fired) that, by modifying some key steps, would end by “emptying” the agreement between the EU and London on Brexit signed by the same. Bojo last year after grueling negotiations. Now has come the resignation of the head of the legal department of the UK government, which has given way to an open controversy with London’s negotiating position on Brexit. the Financial times, explaining that the movement that pushed Jonathan Jones Adding to the sensational farewell is the previous bill, so much so that it makes Downing Street’s chief lawyer “very unhappy.”
A bill that yesterday had already provoked the ire of the president of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen and unleashed the harsh reaction of the EU chief negotiator, Michel Barnier: “Everything that is signed must be respected.”
The fact is that the tone has been raised again and practically nobody – in London and Brussels – is betting on a positive turn in this round. The president of the European Parliament speaks of “serious consequences” in case of not reaching an agreement David Sassoli, that repeats the “pacta sunt servanda” that since yesterday has become the mantra in the EU house addressed to the BoJo executive. “We hope – continues Sassoli – that the UK will fully respect the commitments it negotiated and signed last year – especially with regard to the rights of citizens and Northern Ireland.” Obviously, he is not the only one speaking.
“Europe will not be blackmailed,” he attacks Manfred Weber, which states that “if the ideologues win, everyone will lose.” The leader of the EPP group warned that the Brexit agreements “must be respected, without discussions or further negotiations on the British side. This is the fundamental question of whether international agreements can be trusted.” In short, discontent grows and the scenario of No deal seems to be more and more concrete.
So much so that some MEPs are beginning to call for the interruption of the ongoing negotiations, if the hypothetical British law on the internal market is not removed from the table. For example, the head of the European Parliament’s trade committee says so openly: Bernd Lange, on Spiegel online, the leader of the Linke group reiterates it in the European Parliament Martin Schirdewan, sitting in the Brexit group to which Barnier regularly reports on the progress of the negotiations: “The European Union should stop the talks with London, until Johnson comes to reason,” Schirdewan shoots.
The lack of trust on both sides of the negotiation seems total. Before sitting down at the table, the British chief negotiator David frost He stated that London is asking the EU for “more realism” in the Brexit negotiations. “If we want a deal before the end of the year, we have to move on already this week,” says Frost, hinting that what he cares about is the UK’s status as an “independent state.” And if Brussels “cannot do it, in the very limited time we have left, then we will negotiate to obtain conditions like the ones the EU has with Australia.”
[ad_2]
