[ad_1]
A very difficult match to analyze, either due to the physical and technical supremacy of Atalanta, or due to the precarious athletic conditions of Bologna, which amplified the difficulties: between squeezed owners and early returns out of necessity, the superiority of the rivals against a certain El point seemed insurmountable.
And then it took a few ideas from the coaching staff, along with a reaction of pure heart and attributes, to set right a largely compromised game.
The start was also encouraging, with the rossoblùs quite skilled at dribbling and able to exert good pressure in all areas, even to the clumsy error of Schouten, who in an attempt to counter Ilicic in the area was awarded a highly avoidable penalty , when The Slovenian was already closed by Medel.
Transformation of the penalty that could pave the way for what seemed like a walk for the Bergamas.
The duplication, again from Muriel, was born instead of very high pressure frustrated by the ball on the opponent’s foot, then able to reverse the action: Dijks’ incorrect postponement was just the end of a series of mistakes that started a lot. plus. upstream. But Sinisa’s idea of football is this, take it or leave it.
The double advantage and subsequent continued possession of Gasperini’s men would have stunned a team without heart and feeling no more for their coach, but this team has an abundance of attributes, plus a coach in full control of the situation.
The inclusion of three real players from the bench changed the final script: Domínguez immediately found the correct position with the consequent practicality in the low dribble, Svanberg gave the average quality and the usual jerks, while I think Orsolini made it clear even to his most tenacious opponents the difference between a real footballer and one under construction.
The central part of the recovery produced that genetic mutation of a team that could no longer restart another that began to counterattack blow for blow, causing opponents to run backwards, who do not like having to defend themselves with philosophy. .
The tactical change can be summarized as follows, and at a certain point, Bolonia forced Atalanta to play the game they did not want, getting involved in dribbling, losing references in defensive retreat and therefore safety: the orobics in difficulty are so sensational like when they are confident, they don’t like the middle ground.
In a foreshortening of the match, Bologna managed to put together a high shot by Barrow from his tile, a shot by Svanberg stopped in two halves by Gollini, the goal by Tomiyasu, a header by Orsolini with the door open countered by Gosens, The goal of Paz and Soriano’s final counterattack, who instead of trying to touch the subnet, turned the goalkeeper around trying to cross: all this against rivals who tend to concede much less. Gasperini’s complaints at the end of the match are proof of how his presumption is adequate to train only the provincials: he is bothered by the existence of his opponents, but in football there are also others!
Like a boxer counted many times, the BFC got up, cornered, resisted the opponent’s blows, took a breath and deserved the final tie on points: never like in this case does the concept of resilience evoked many times by Mihajlovic fit.
Resisting and preparing to react is what Rossoblù did last night: a good omen for the rest of the championship.
Tosco – www.madeinbo.tv
© Reproduction reserved
Photo: Imago Images
