[ad_1]
Father Jesuit it is a reality in every rule. Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been sitting in Peter’s chair for seven and a half years despite the prejudice that has accompanied the Order. Of course, Francis is a singular Jesuit to some, but until a few decades ago it was almost useless to predict the election of a member of the Society as bishop of Rome. Because many ecclesiastical circles have always perceived the Order founded by Saint Ignatius as a only. Almost like something out of the context of the “Church”. The history of the Jesuits regardingchurch it is seasoned with commissioning. This information would be enough to understand the amazement at the election of the former archbishop of Buenos Aires. We must not go too far back: even during the pontificate of Benedict XVI it was assumed that a Jesuit commissioner was appointed.
It was not Joseph Ratzinger himself who painted that scene, but another prominent clergyman. Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who had clashed (so to speak) with Ratzinger in the 2005 Conclave, got in the way and nothing was done about it. The Jesuit had been the candidate of the progressives in the assembly that had elected the German Conservative. Ultimately, Bergoglio had acquired a certain curial weight, although the Argentine and the Curia were never roommates. The rest is history. In other words, the contrast between the Company and the hierarchies is not a thing of yesterday. Only with the pontificate of Francis, perhaps, theological differences are now dormant. The connective tissue between the Jesuits and the Vatican has always been complex. Sant’Ignazio founded the Company in 1534. Since then, a fight begins.
In reality, Bergoglio has something typical of the Jesuit: diplomatic multilateralism and the continuous attention that the South American pays to the existential-economic peripheries. The history of the Jesuits is also steeped in mediation between very different powers. The comrades almost never saw bilateral diplomacy as a useful tool. The missions at the end of the world are instead a prelude to the geography of faith that this pontiff is drawing. Yesterday the Jesuits awaited the conversion of Japan, Today Jorge Mario Bergoglio counts among his “people” the indigenous people of the Amazon, who have never been as central in the history of Christianity as today. Let’s take a few steps back.
The first to suppress the Order is Pope Clement XIV. The Jesuits are not even three hundred years old, but they are already taking note of how their journey into the world is perceived. Of course, politics at the time was not what it is today, and nation states boasted that they had more than a few powers to influence the decisions of the incumbent of the Vatican chair. It will take the Second Vatican Council to break a prejudice. Not even that date will actually completely end disagreements.
People say that Pope Luciani he was about to remember the Society of Jesus. Then Pope John Paul I passed away in the mysterious circumstances that we know of. And the letter of reprimand to the followers of Saint Ignatius will not be published. Those who today relate that background are sure that the last Italian Pope wanted to put more than one accent on the supposed theological drift that the Jesuits were following in that period. 68 ‘was left behind for a decade, but anti-modern circles still remember today how the American Jesuits have partially embraced the demands of the people of 1968. And in the northern states, the Jesuits remain an outpost of doctrinal progressivism. Before Luciani, it was Paul VI who expressed some perplexity, especially regarding the positions of Father Arrupe, for which the Holy See of Bergoglio’s leadership has meanwhile opened a cause for canonization. Arrupe, in short, did not want to extend the vow of fidelity to the Pope also to non-consecrated Jesuits. And John Paul II? He has commissioned them.
The Jesuit was Karl Rahner, the “New Church” theorist on whom contemporary progressive circles would draw. A Church fundamentally open to changes that would not be shared by teachings, tradition, doctrine and practice. Bergoglio had a conflictive relationship with the Company, so much so that he was even “exiled” to Córdoba for a period. Those who oppose the ruler’s work, however, see a common thread that begins at Rahner and runs straight to Francis.
