[ad_1]
NurPhoto via Getty Images
“The Venetians rewarded Zaia for the way he handled the epidemic, with all the merits and contradictions of the case. In a disastrous situation, the president listened to me following the scientific evidence. If it wasn’t for me, Zaia would have made a mess. On February 28, he spoke of a media epidemic, then he took credit for himself and I couldn’t keep quiet ”. Thus, in an interview with The impression the virologist Andrea Crisanti.
“I found it a human weakness – he adds – but I did not put my feet on my head and defended my merits and the University of Padua. Gratitude is a rare feeling that sometimes generates hostility. “
Crisanti says that he received the offer of a candidacy “in the Senate from the center-left and the M5, but I prefer to remain a scientist. This is how I feel most useful. Maybe when I retire I will think about it, but there are five years left ”.
The scientist defines himself “against inequalities and for equal opportunities. I liked Blair’s third way. I am definitely not right. I find a reference in the Democratic Party, even if it is torn by so many contradictions.
Crisanti reiterated his no to the G20 on health in Lombardy “If we want to commemorate the dead, let’s do it there, but if we celebrate the Italian model against the coronavirus, better Veneto or Lazio.”
[ad_2]
