[ad_1]
“Something absolutely imaginable has happened, so we will have to understand what will be said when we have our vaccine data sheet.Thus, the virologist Fabrizio Pregliasco, Director of Health of the Orthopedic Institute IRCCS Galeazzi of Milan in an interview with Fanpage.it, following the warning from the British Medicines Regulation Agency (MHRA) after the appearance of adverse reactions in two of the hundreds of people who received the first dose of the drug yesterday at the beginning of the public vaccination campaign in the United Kingdom. Pfizer / BioNTech anti-Covid vaccine. Those affected, two in their forties and the health workers had “a significant history of allergiesAnd, according to media reports, they are believed to have suffered from what in medical jargon is called anaphylaxis, a particularly severe allergic reaction that can lead to rashes, shortness of breath, and sometimes a drop in blood pressure.
What happened?
Two cases of allergic reactions have been reported, occurring in subjects with a significant history of allergy. A situation that led the British Authority to recommend avoiding the administration of the vaccine to those who have had serious episodes of allergy to medicines or food. It is, therefore, a precautionary measure, an indication that may arise when vaccinations are carried out on a large scale. However, as far as we know, it turns out that the two people had no serious conditions and are recovering well, so there is no drama.
Are reactions like these weird?
Yes, they are reactions that occur very rarely even with other vaccines, and that are treated with an action to control anaphylactic shock, therefore with the management of the allergic reaction with cortisone or adrenaline.
How is it possible that these two people had a history of allergies not taken into account?
In fact, in the pre-vaccination analysis, it is one of the questions that is often asked. Something absolutely normal from a practical point of view, since we know that allergic people can suffer from allergic reactions, however …
Is it the rush of wanting to go with the shots?
There was surely a geopolitical desire to show the efficiency of Brexit, so what happened could be properly inserted into the context. Speed, on the other hand, makes sense, because the nations that get vaccinated first will be the ones that get out first, I’m not talking about the tunnel, because vaccination will take a while to reach high levels of coverage, but surely this will be an advantage. . This is because what we are doing now somehow slows down the rate of spread of the virus, but it certainly does not block its circulation. Also, in this situation, we cannot regain tracking for now.
[ad_2]
