[ad_1]
Three Dpcm in less than two weeks. Massimo Cacciari called it a “regulatory hoax.” The result is a series of meaningless contradictions that displace the country and end up strongly penalizing it economically and socially. To read the latest restriction sheet signed by the Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte in fact, inconsistencies and disarming inconsistencies cannot escape. For example: why were gyms and swimming pools closed after just a few days ago they were asked to comply with the law in order to continue in business and had done so by reaching, for the umpteenth time, in their wallet? Because cinemas and theaters, which have always respected the spacing imposed by CTs, they are considered dangerous places, while the subway cars are crowded beyond belief, aren’t they? Why is a restaurant considered a safe place for lunch and not for dinner? And again: why should an eight year old sit at the desk, while a fourth fourteen year old has to endure distance learning?
“I have always thought that where there is a protocol and where the protocol is strictly and strictly respected, the risk of contagion is certainly very low”. What should be obvious today is important to underline more strongly. Therefore, the statements of the Vice Minister of Health, Pierpaolo Sileri, are even more important in the face of a government that day by day is closing the country in another devastating blockade. “In these measures he did not completely agree – he admitted Agora – I am not, to tell the truth, totally agree “. The point is that most decisions made by the executive seem to have no scientific evidence. Let’s take the school, for example. Finally, the Minister of Education, Lucía Azzolina, assured that the virus does not spread in the classrooms. “In schools, he rightly said, outbreaks range from 3.5% to 3.8%.”. However, here high school students have been quarantined. This is how Daddy’s nightmare returns, within reach.
What about the four diners who will be able to sit at a table? ristorante? Why four? Hard to say. We had tried to explain the “six” used to frame the maximum number of people for a dinner at home and we had not succeeded. Even the Scientific Technical Committee finally had to admit that there was no scientific evidence. Also because, within the same decree, the possibility of having thirty guests to the ceremonies and the guests was guaranteed. receptions. Perhaps because the situation is more controlled here? But they do not consider it that way at a dinner in a restaurant where there is no interaction between the different tables. And the theaters and cinemas? There was no notable outbreak, but the choice was inexorable. “Why, instead, mess Are they authorized? “asked former Minister of Cultural Heritage Walter Veltroni.
Reading the last Dpcm, it is very clear that the government it is trying to protect itself by generally restricting the freedoms of Italians rather than taking responsibility for specific and effective interventions to counter the spread of infection. Although it is now clear that the weakest group is those over seventy (the average age of deaths has risen to 82 years and 62.9% of deaths have three or more diseases), one wonders why Conte He did not go out of his way to protect the elderly rather than keep the young at home. It is true that the coronavirus it also circulates widely among the latter, but it is also true that very often they are asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic patients. For this reason, the governor of Liguria, Giovanni Toti, raised the hypothesis of a separation of the population in a personal capacity. “Measures to protect or leave the most vulnerable people at home would be more useful,” Old people and those who live with various pathologies “, explained in an interview with Print. The proposal obviously fell on deaf ears: the executive, in fact, preferred the hard way.
The result of the last squeeze is a emergency shutdown disguised that will further weaken our economy. For restaurants, bars, pizzerias and wine bars, closing at 6 p.m. is a serious blow, especially after the investments made in recent months to adapt to the restrictions imposed by the government. When asked that the tables be spaced to guarantee the meter of distance between one client and another, they ran to adapt. When they imposed a continuous cleaning of the premises, they did not flinch. They even placed gels in each corner and differentiated entry and exit doors completed with lines on the floor to avoid any accidental contact. When asked to increase the outdoor tables, they bought the mushrooms to heat them outdoors. But it was not enough. And so the knife fell on them. With the joke: they can be served for breakfast and lunch but a minute before the aperitif starts, lower the blinds. Oh yeah, just a few days ago technicians We were guaranteed that the curfew at 11pm was enough to contain the infections. All guesswork. Because the scientific studies that support the measures taken are never attached to the different Dpcm.
The great absentee is always and in any case the public transport. In large cities, trains, subways and buses are robbed every day by those who have to go to work and cannot afford to smart work. Not only has the capacity been raised to 80%, but the number of attractions has not been increased or heavy taxes, such as Zone C, which you have to pay to enter the historic center, have not been eliminated. And the fighters? I’m giving Many. Discouraged from the car ride, all the workers rushed into public transportation. Although there isn’t a single person moving around without a mask, does the government really believe that a crowded subway is less risky than a restaurant with well-spaced tables or a soccer field where some kids kick the ball and train for Sunday’s game? Maybe, instead of dividing the hair in four to understand who is jogging and who is walking or wasting paper to explain what it is “motor activity“Or whatever, someone at Palazzo Chigi should be more in agreement on interventions that actually contain the virus without starving us.
