[ad_1]
The temptation to resort to easy puns should always be avoided. But that something could cause confusion was clear early on, when brothels suddenly became a priority for M5S. The Rousseau platform debuted on July 5, 2016, asking members to make proposals to bring them to Parliament as soon as possible. Second, the reopening of closed houses was surprising.
That result, received with some bewilderment by the leaders of the time, it did not affect the nascent mythology of the technological structure that at the time was defined as the Operating System of the 5 Star Movement. An ant does not have to know how the anthill works, otherwise all ants would aspire to play the best and least tiring roles, creating a coordination problem. This passage from Tu sei Rete, Davide Casaleggio’s book that adds to the thought of his father, also represents the conceptual ambiguity of a structure that is presented as a symbol of direct democracy but that actually has the function of recruiting, profiling data, fund-raising. And not of real participation. Ultimately, it will be decided only by the Chief, who is in fact entrusted with the ability to reverse the unwanted results of the voting, or to address them by writing the questions in a certain way.
Rousseau was born in the storm. The statute of the association is written in the room of the Auxologico hospital in Milan where Gianroberto Casaleggio is dying. The last phone call with Beppe Grillo was a fierce fight, without definitive reconciliation, the negative culmination of a spent relationship. The platform, intended to take the place of the ex-comedian’s blog, is affected by this fierce dissent, because it is conceived above all to protect the Movement from any attempt to escalate, to preserve the spirit of its origins and, ultimately, to entrust your dynastic control and management. an instrument of internal power, which as such works perfectly, even in times of decadence and relative representativeness. Within the M5S it is certainly not a mystery that in January 2020 Luigi Di Maio resigns as political leader also due to the poor result obtained in the vote on the team of the future, his latest attempt at mediation with the most radical wing represented by Davide. Casaleggio. Little feedback, little illusion, goodbye.
However, there was a time when these flaws were so obvious they did not count, and the fates of the Movement seemed to overlap those of Rousseau. The first two years of life are the time of greatest splendor. The platform welcomes the legacy of the Sacred blog and the Meet up, the 391 virtual groups from which the M5S was generated. On the eve of the 2018 general elections, he focuses his work on the selection of candidates, the deputies being the most successful to date. It matters little if the platform presented as a technological prodigy has obvious flaws and distortions.
In 2017, three hacker attacks demonstrate their vulnerability, complete with a variety of jokes, such as the inclusion in the database of a fake one million euro donation made by then-Democratic Party Secretary Matteo Renzi or the fake sale of data in exchange for bitcoins. Passwords are changed, only to find that expelled members of the Movement, defined as inactive users by a curious press release, still have access to Rousseau. The following year, the investigation of the privacy guarantor establishes that the names of the members have been communicated to third parties, without the consent of the interested parties, stigmatizes the indisputable technical obsolescence and highlights how the security measures for the control of operations of perplexity destination voting. But the guarantor is named Antonello Soro, a former Democratic Party deputy minus him, the sworn enemy. This is life.
Rather, the aura of purity that surrounds Rousseau prevails. The platform becomes a simulation of the old M5S, the umbilical cord that unites the Vaffa with the new grisaille government, justifies them with its existence. And precisely in order not to touch a status quo that goes in the opposite direction to Casaleggio’s intransigence, it increases its contradictions. The question about the case of the Diciotti ship, which sees the ally Matteo Salvini involved, is changed overnight to become a riddle of the week, who wants to say yes to the imputability of the Minister of the Interior must vote no, and vice versa.
But we are already in 2019. The era of sinister realism began a long time ago, the closed houses have never been reopened. Especially since Rousseau does not take off. The deputies are always the same, just over a hundred thousand, the parliamentarians are intolerant of this virtual bottleneck and its costs. The mythical rig soon turns into tinsel, a mandatory passage useful only to shake the M5S out of shame by certifying indigestible options. And in any case, if something does not go as it should, according to the statute, it is not only possible to vote again, but also to annul the decision. Mario Draghi can sleep peacefully.
Feb 10, 2021 (change Feb 10, 2021 | 22:57)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED
[ad_2]
