[ad_1]
“Everything is still on the table.” OR Matteo renzi she has not with no intention of ending the battle with the prime minister and the government. If the public statements of Alive italy After the face-to-face with the prime minister who had hinted at some openings, the former prime minister thought of again scuttling the negotiations. Interviewed by Myrta merlino a The air that pulls On La7, the senator in fact said that the hypothesis of the withdrawal of the ministers of Italy alive from the government has not yet been avoided: “Everything is still on the table.” Or rather: nothing has changed with respect to the daily threats of crisis that have been launched on television and newspapers for about two weeks. “We have raised a problem of method and meritHe said again. “They showed us that we were right in the method, a step forward. It depends on the merits whether we agree or not ”.
In conclusion, Alive italy He will deliver his comments on the recovery fund to the prime minister early next week, but in the meantime, Renzi has no intention of easing the tension. And to the answer if you risk an early vote, as the Minister of Culture has said Dario Franceschini In the last days he replied: “It is bad to say it like that, but it’s clear that Franceschini is bragging as in political poker games. But here we don’t have to play, here we have to decide how to spend the recovery money ”.
However, shortly before Renzi, again in L’Aria che tira, the Minister of Economy had spoken Roberto Gualtieri, which not only announced that the so-called working group on which the confrontation with Italia viva broke out will be a mission structure that will be established with a “decree”, but has also tried to reduce tensions. “It is good to have all the political discussions but we must not forget that we are in crisis, we owe the Italians some answers. The budget law gives many, now it is necessary to finalize the Recovery plan, we can’t wait to submit the plan late. We are in a position to do it, but not a day is lost ”. In fact, he added: “” The government must last, a government crisis during a pandemic would be truly paradoxical. But it will not happen. I am confident that these political tensions will also be overcome and that everyone will be responsible ”.
For Renzi, the hypothesis that there will be a vote in Parliament and, if necessary, another majority will be formed for another government, is far from remote. In fact, reading between the lines of his statements, it is clear that the stage does not care at all. In the event of a government crisis, “we will not go to vote”, he always replied to Merlin, “there will be a majority in Parliament and I think Common sense requires that you stop fighting and spend money.“From Europe.” If someone thinks they are threatening, the vote is wrong, in a democracy the vote is not a threat. Franceschini is the Minister of Culture, in charge of Culture. He is the Minister of Tourism, he took care of the hotels The President of the Republic is not Franceschini, but Sergio Mattarella. Franceschini is not Ribéry, it is Mattarella who has that role there“.
The problem for the former prime minister now, once the question of the method is shelved thanks to the greater participation of the majority forces, advances. actual division of funds. It is on this that Italia viva wants to comment. “How much money do we invest in health, in tourism? We are finally talking about these issues ”, argued Renzi. “The money of Europe, so much, we had never seen it. Compared to 209 billion, do we want to waste it? If we miss this opportunity, we will not go anywhere, we will cut our feet ”.
Then, the former prime minister relaunched the same proposal that he made in the document delivered to Conte last Friday: “We unlock the Month for health and then i 9 billion foreseen in the Recovery plan, we release them and put them in culture and tourism ”. This is his workhorse: only last Monday he released a video (here the fact of checking ilfattoquotidiano.it) reiterating a lot of inaccurate information about it. For example, Renzi insists that the funds allocated to health would be only 9, but at the moment there are at least 16. In addition, there is no lack of resources to attend the emergency and the use of the Month would change little or nothing the subject. the amount of the loan amount (36 billion) that would allow a saving of just under 300 million compared to an expense of 50 billion. All the information Renzi also has, but never talks about. “The Five Stars,” Renzi said today, “before they go home they vote a lot of what they have to vote for. Furthermore, M5 MPs after two and a half years in Rome they found out about the files and they know that the Month saves 300 million euros. We sit at a table, everyone has to make an effort, I don’t have the truth in my pocket but they have to explain why I’m wrong. If they explain to me why I’m wrong, I’ll stop ”. But beyond the merit, relaunching by insisting on the Month as Renzi does is the way to not only keep the conflict open, but also inevitably leads to a crisis: the 5 stars do not intend to accept the use of the Month and for the moment this does not it’s not even one of Conte’s priorities.
Renzi, however, when asked directly whether or not he wanted to lead the country into a government crisis, took time: “A crisis that leads to a vote? Common sense wants us to stop fighting and start spending money. I have no negotiations or problems: there is a letter, which is public ”. Then he admitted, “sometimes we also play palace games, but this time it is not a palace game because as long as there is parliamentary democracy in Parliament, governments are made and unmade. But this time the thing is simpler: the issue is the possibility of spending money that we will never have again“.
Finally, speaking of knots still on the table, the leader of Italy alive also spoke of another of the requests made to the prime minister. “In my opinion, the secret services should be led by a technical expert other than the prime minister,” he said. “When Berlusconi was there, Letta (Gianni, ed) was there, when Monti was there, De Gennaro, when Renzi was Minniti. We have all always delegated, why does Conte centralize? There must also be signs of novelty in this“.
[ad_2]
