[ad_1]
NAPOLIST POST – The isolated Papu Gómez and determined defense of Gasperini. Here the club expels the coach and gives in to the wishes of the dressing room
In the city of eternal contradictions, where legality is confused with prevarication and where prevarication is confused with common sense, no one has realized the umpteenth lesson that advanced and civilized Bergamo has taught noisy and inept Naples. The subject touches football, but it is fundamentally the management of men and the application of correct behavior.
The similarities are many: team in deficit of results, champions in the balance and decisive men who instead of balancing and making themselves available to those who pay their wages, rebel with the latest from the lazzaroni against a club and a coach who ask you for sacrifice and professional behavior. The management of problems is as stellar as the GDP of the two cities.
Bergamo’s behavior when Papu Gómez (most representative player) has ignored the orders of the coach Gasperini (currently the best Italian coach by destination) has been of maximum support and maximum confidence in the coach. Allowing you to manage the technical part in the most suitable way for the Turin technician. Gasperini was so supported by the company, In addition to supporting the decisions, he invited Papu Gómez not to make judgments through social networks, so as not to destabilize the environment. There are no more details about it, but the Papu is silent, knowing how to avoid very high fines.
The evil Neapolitan management, of which Aurelio De Laurentiis is the first responsibleIt was obviously much more theatrical, ridiculous and ridiculous. The club, until now an example of football management, has turned its back on its recent history and its coach, allowing the rioters to take possession of the locker room, thanks also to a docile and myopic technical change in the long term, and of less effect. placebo immediately. The management of the last year from the behavioral and sporting point of view was a real failure. The latest scandal from a company that hasn’t guessed one for a long time was the “sharing” of retirement. Going through the initial ostracism in Lozano and the provisions of the now English Allan. Obviously we are not talking about a shared management of the “Corinthian Democracy”, but of surrendering to the costume bands, definitely marking the decline of an enlightened management until last year, now only disinterested and very clumsy.
[ad_2]
