[ad_1]
After the hearing at the Coni held in the afternoon, the College of Guarantors has ruled accepting Napoli’s appeal regarding the 3-0 at the table (plus the penalty point) for Juventus after the absence of the Azzurri in the eighth October in Turin. Let’s remember all the stages of history. De Laurentiis: “We live in a country where those who respect the laws cannot be convicted”
JUVE-FIORENTINA LIVE
Canceled without postponement. This is the formula with which the Guarantee College has Napoli’s appeal against FIGC and the sentences that inflicted the 0-3 at the table were accepted and a penalty point to the Neapolitan club for not appearing in Turin for the game against Juve on October 4. The factual decision cancels the result on the table and the penalty spot for Gattuso’s team, thus amounting to 24 points reaching Roma in fourth place. Furthermore, as a consequence Juve loses the 3 victory points at the table, also sliding to 24 while waiting to recover the match against Naples.
Appeal accepted, jubilation of the Napoli players
The Napoli players learned of the success of the club’s appeal to the Coni school in the match with Juventus while they were in Maradona stadium. The Azzurri players had just finished training when the news of the cancellation of the penalty spot and the decision to play the match with the Bianconeri was announced: in the locker room an exaltation of the whole group began.
De Laurentiis: “Napoli always follow the rules”
After accepting the news of the appeal, Italian President Aurelio De Laurentiis posted a message on Twitter: “We are happy. We live in a country where those who respect the laws cannot be convicted. And Napoli always follow the rules. “
Serie A, the new ranking after the ruling
- Milan 31
- Inter 30
- Napoli 24 (1 race less)
- Juventus 24 (1 race less)
- Rome 24
- Sassuolo 23
- Atalanta 21
Reconstruction of history
Oct 3: Napoli does not start after ASL order
deepening
Juve-Napoli chaos, but we play for the League. And now?
It is the eve of the match valid for round 3 of Serie A, Saturday that records the lost departure from Naples to Turin. By decision ofLocal Health Authority from the capital of Campania, the trip of the Azzurri is blocked after the order to remain in “fiduciary isolation for 14 days after the date of the last exhibition with the positive case in question (October 1)” and to communicate the address where the isolation will be. It all starts after Elmas positivity news, 24 hours later than Zielinski and a staff member (found on Friday, October 2). In the opinion of the ASL of Naples, it is too dangerous to move such a high number of potential positives, that they came into close contact with the first two positives of Naples and only 6 days after the game against Genoa, than in the days after the game de San Paolo had registered 22 positive cases (19 players and 3 from the squad). Absence determined therefore by a local authority, but for Lega Serie A, the match is still scheduled for Sunday, October 4, as announced by Juventus Through a press release: the Bianconero club anticipates that it will appear at the stadium to go out to the field regularly. To recall how the bases published by Lega Serie A, on October 2 in an official statement, establish that if a team has at least 13 negative players and therefore available (including a goalkeeper) and no show, will remedy a 3-0 loss.
October 4: Juve on the pitch, Napoli not
See also
Juve in the stadium, not Naples: a surreal night
As it arose on the eve, Naples is not present at the Allianz Stadium unlike Juventus and the triad of referees led by Doveri as well as commissioners, professionals (journalists, photographers and operators) and some amateurs. The bianconeri arrive shortly after 7.30 pm, Buffon and Bonucci also appear in the rain. They will not play and everyone leaves the facilities. A Sky Sport 24 President Andrea Agnelli exposes the club’s position: “I think it is essential to clarify: a positive situation within a group of teams was predictable and in this case a FIGC Protocol approved by the CTS is applied. There is a lot of clarity, and this is what we also did yesterday after having found two positivities. If the protocol is perfected, we will adhere accordingly. “And in the contacts with Naples:”De Laurentiis wrote me a message, I replied that Juventus, as always, complies with the regulations. Did you ask for the game to be postponed? Yes. But we have rules that tell us how to behave. In my opinion, the Local Health Authority of Naples cannot intervene if the entire FIGC protocol that refers to the government circular is not observed at some point. Otherwise, it does not intervene. “
October 14: sports judge, 3-0 at the table and -1 point
read also
3-0 Juve, the reasons for the sports judge
First “Judge”, or postponed decision, on sports judge Gerardo Mastandrea further investigation is reserved to decide the matter, postponing the verdict until the following week. Meanwhile, Napoli’s lawyer, Mattia Grassani, says that the club “has had copious correspondence with the local health authorities in Naples” and that “Napoli is not being investigated by the Federal Prosecutor’s Office.” On October 14, here is the decision of the sports judge: 0-3 on the table for Napoli and 1 penalty point for the Campania club. The motivation reads: “The documents of the Health Authorities draw an image that the Judge does not consider at all incompatible with the application of the specific rules of the specific FIGC Health Protocol and, therefore, with the possibility of playing the game of soccer scheduled in Turin “. “And again: the judge decided on the non-presence of Napoli in Turin and on the “causes of force majeure” claimed by Napoli applying article 10 of sports justice (judged in the absence of the “circumstances beyond one’s control”). According to Mastandrea, the correspondence between the club and the local Asl did not prevent the transfer to Naples: this was possible on October 4. but not the previous October 2 and 3. That’s not all: according to the sports judge, Napoli would have previously resigned the departure to Turin, even before the clarification requested from the ASL. Napoli announces the appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal, the second degree of sports justice, and then, finally, to the Coni College of Guarantee. If necessary, once the three degrees of sports justice have been exhausted, the club would resort to the TAR.
October 17: the wrath of Gattuso
deepening
Gattuso: “I wanted to play with Juve, I’m inc …”
Napoli prepares the appeal based primarily on correspondence with local ASL 2, which recommended fiduciary isolation. To demonstrate that the team was organizing the away game in Turin, the video of the pre-Juve final and other documents will probably also be attached, such as the reservation of the anti-Covid tests for Sunday, October 4 in Turin. Meanwhile, after the 4-1 in Atalanta, Rino Gattuso Explain: “Napoli wanted to play, we all agreed to leave, including the club. But I’m the most pissed off … of all. Rosico very much, I am angry with those who did not let us go to Turin because I am convinced that we would have faced Juve. Which is always the team to beat ”.
November 10: Napoli’s appeal rejected
See also
Naples, appeal rejected: “We will go to Coni”
Scheduled for November 9, the decision of the Federal Court of Appeals (i.e. the second degree of judgment) is preceded by the remote connection of Aurelio De Laurentiis to explain Napoli’s position. Being registered as Juventus had no intention of opposing the decision, whatever it was. Sentence postponed but official the following day: He rejected Napoli’s appeal and confirmed the 3-0 at the Juve table (with a penalty point against the Azzurri). The motivation: “Contrary to what is alleged in the appeal, the applicant company was not at all in the objective impossibility of contesting the aforementioned meeting, having, on the other hand, directed, voluntarily and pre-established, his own conduct in the days prior to the game in the sense of not playing the game, with a clear violation of the fundamental principles on which the sports system is based, namely , loyalty, fairness and honesty. “And again:” The ultimate goal of the sports system is to improve sports merit, loyalty, honesty and a healthy competitive spirit. This principle does not appear to have been respected, in this case, by the applicant company. (Naples, ed.), Whose behavior in the days leading up to Juventus-Naples, aims to pre-establish itself, so to speak, an ‘alibi’ for not playing that game. The lack of dispute did not depend on a cause of force majeure, but on a voluntary choice, if not predetermined.. Proof of this is the content of the documentation, beginning with the note from ASL Napoli 1 sent to the Naples Health Manager on October 2, 2020. “In the statement, President Sandulli concludes:”What emerges is the pre-ordered will of Napoli not to play the game. This Court cannot fail to emphasize that Napoli is not even respectful of the rest of the Serie A clubs, which in completely similar situations have regularly played the matches in which they have participated ”.
November 10: Napoli replica
read also
Juve-Napoli, the reasons for the sentence
“The SSCN takes note of the decision of the Court of Appeal for Sports and is already working to prepare the appeal before the Coni Sports Guarantee College. The SSCN does not fully agree with the ruling that casts unacceptable shadows on the Company’s conduct He neglects very clear documents in his favor and delegitimizes the work of the regional health authorities. The SSCN has always pursued values such as loyalty and sporting merit and also in this case it will undertake all initiatives to do justice to its conduct aimed at respecting public health and that the field is the only judge to decide the result of a match soccer “. Therefore, the appeal to the Coni College of Guarantee was announced.
December 4: appeal to the Sports Guarantee Board
deepening
Juve-Napoli, appealed to Coni: the note
On the note, Napoli asks “the nullity of the contested resolution of the National Court of Sports and directly order Lega Serie A and FIGC, as far as they are concerned, to dispute the Juventus-Napoli match, valid for the Serie A 2020-2021 championship, as well as the restitution of the penalty point in the ranking imposed with the same sanction. “The appeal also specifies that”Verify the illegality of the non-recognition of the case of force majeure. constituted by foreclosure to travel by health authorities; due to the need to streamline the entire sports judicial procedure, aimed at ensuring that the game in question, where the dispute is sanctioned, can be disputed as soon as possible ”.
