[ad_1]
The controversy over Cyberpunk 2077 seems to cross the boundaries of logic in certain situations, like in this particular (human) user case that after requesting and getting the refund has then protested because he is no longer capable of use the game.
Obviously, the terms of the refund that would seem universal are not exactly universal, at least for those that are a little harsh: it happens that a user has been found protesting on Twitter against theofficial Xbox support because, once the refund is received, you can no longer find the game.
Think about it: after paying you back, it appears that Microsoft has removed Cyberpunk 2077 from their console! To this point the strong powers go:
“I just got a refund for Cyberpunk and now you have it remote from my console ??? I still want to play it! He fooled the world by allowing a game to be released and sold on his console, even if it doesn’t work and won’t work for months! “
Although the last part of the protest It can also be shared, or at least follow a certain logic, the first part seems to reveal some problems in understanding the basic operation of the return, which obviously occurs with the condition of “returning” the product, or deleting the digital version of the game , in the case of where it is.
The anecdote was related by Tom Warren on Twitter and shows a bit ‘how within these broad waves of outrage there are also many people who exaggerate, or simply do not understand how things are.
Meanwhile, the refund issue evolves after Sony’s initiatives and Microsoft’s extension, with the recent CD Projekt RED update.
[ad_2]
