[ad_1]
Pietro Senaldi
Checking last night between Giuseppe Conte and Matteo Renzi it doesn’t move the question an inch. The story is well known. The leader of Italia Viva launched his offensive against Palazzo Chigi ten days ago. The former scrap dealer, although not yet in the opposition, accused the executive of incompetence and the prime minister of wanting to be a petty dictator, surrounding himself with a team of commissioners who only report to him. Renzi’s goal was to keep the Prime Minister in check until the budget law was passed. Conte, however, escaped the trap, opening a check on the government with all the forces of the majority and keeping Italia Alive in last place, to meet her only after having received guarantees from Cinquestelle and Pd. Furthermore, Matteo found himself in even more trouble because yesterday’s meeting came at the end of a triumphant day for the government, which after more than a hundred days managed to free the Sicilian fishermen captured by the Libyan general’s army. Haftar. The trip of the prime minister and the chancellor Di Maio a Benghazi, almost as if to publicly pay tribute to the kidnapper, who was paid a high price, is very uninstitutional and probably diplomatically disqualifying. However, they are evaluations of politicians, because the mission was a success in the media, only partially spoiled by the vanity of the prime minister’s spokesman. Rocco casalino, who addressed the international incident by advertising improperly with a mobile phone.
The letter
Renzi tried to reverse the situation by posting a long letter to the prime minister on Facebook, before their meeting. In it, the leader of Italia Viva repeated all the accusations of ineptitude in handling the pandemic and violations of democracy made in recent days to the government and then asked some key questions: the position that the country should take in the geopolitical chessboard after victory in U.S of Biden, whom Renzi considers a personal friend of his, when the government will reform justice and because the executive has decided to commit most of the money from Europe to the Recovery Fund in existing projects and not for new investments. All seasoned with harsh accusations about school and transportation issues and the ostentatious concern that Conte’s Italy will be the last both in the vaccine race and in economic recovery. A long and shareable cahier de doleance, whose main objective was to prevent the prime minister from giving a comprehensive answer and to keep him drenched until January, according to the original plan of the Florentine politician. In short, we head at twelve. The question still open is whether the leader of Italia Viva will go to the bottom. Certainly the League of Salvini until a few days ago I was cherishing the dream that the Tuscan Matteo jumped to the other side and, with some fifty grillini in free movement, would help form a new government. The project, however, was dismantled on the right by Meloni, who managed to convince the former interior minister not to trust his namesake, and abandoned by the men of Mattarella, which does not accept drastic changes of scenery. To wreck everything, the Democratic Party was also involved, in whose trap Renzi fell as happened to Salvini in August 2019. Gypsies and the comrades, who had given the League hope of bringing Italy to the vote a year ago, also deceived the cunning Rignano, sent to the front to wage war against Conte and then left without covering fire by the old men. subordinates of the party.
Change scheme
The former mayor of Florence now he’s in the middle of the ford. A skilled politician, he managed to buy time, but sooner or later he will have to decide whether to back down, take the whistle of the case, or move on, giving substance and aggression to his attack to overthrow the prime minister. From our point of view, the path is mandatory. The Italia Viva operation is interesting, but in more than a year of life has not yet managed to get off the ground in consensus and it will hardly do without changing the game. Renzi cannot pass. He is a high challenge fighter, not a skirmish fighter. Those who argue that he is agitating so much just to have more weight in choosing the new public seats to be assigned are doing him a disservice. Man loves power, but is not satisfied with so little. The feeling is that you will continue until you find a more solid balance than you currently have. It helps you that you are not alone in our Parliament that has to invent a new center of gravity.
[ad_2]