[ad_1]
Now that the spotlight is onWorld Health Organization, some heads are likely to pop. The facts are now sadly known. And they not only refer to the lack of updating of the Pandemic Plan, a factor that undoubtedly contributed to facing the pandemic in a chaotic way last March and caused impressive mortality rates, but also (and above all) the report that the European division of the institution drafted on Italy’s response to the pandemic. Answer that Francesco Zambon, coordinator of the authors of the document published on May 11 and disappeared in a few hours, defines “chaotic” me “makeshift”. What happened in those weeks? Nobody wants to tell it. The versions are many and they do not match. And when the Bergamo prosecutors tried to see clearly, the WHO silenced the truth by forcing investigators to use immunity. Not only. In the last hours, as the agency finds out LaPresse From sources close to the dossier, the European manager, Hans Henri Klug, would be willing to withdraw the powers of the current vice president of the European section, Ranieri War.
The yellow of the lost report
From the start, rebuilt in Coronavirus Black Book (click here), the World Health Organization has made nothing but mistakes in managing coronavirus. There is the tweet of January 14 in which he denies the transmission of the virus from person to person. There are the inaccuracies contained in the report drawn up after having sent their delegates to Wuhan to understand which enemy we had started to fight against. There are doc packages on the use of masks that have done nothing but create misunderstandings and embarrassment. And then there are the shadows that, as already anticipated in recent days since Giornale.it, have brought the names of the leaders of Geneva to end not only on the table of magistrates in Bergamo, but also on that of other prosecutors in the beautiful country. Investigators would point to the report titled An unprecedented challenge: the first response to Covid-19. What initially intrigued was the swift cancellation of the WHO website after being put online a few hours earlier. The reason for this setback could be explained by some fiery passages. These include the failure to update the “pandemic plan”. Despite European and international regulations, Italy has faced the pandemic with ancient patterns dating back fourteen years.
The confrontation with the prosecutor
To be clear, he called Guerra in for an audition on November 5. The WHO deputy director appeared before prosecutors, but “in a personal capacity.” It is likely that this posture has begun to break down the wall of silence that has been built around the Palace of Geneva. Among the accusations made against him is also that of having made pressures to cancel the report. To nail it there would also be emails that Report has made public and on which a lawsuit is now dancing. “If even the WHO assumes a critical role that is not in accordance with the minister’s political sensitivity which is certainly superior to mine, I don’t think we are doing a good service to the country.”, he would write. “Remember that they have just made a voluntary contribution of 10 million in trust and as a sign of appreciation for what they have done so far, after six years of zero.”. What is really behind the censored report? What prompted the WHO to hastily cancel the publication? Did the Minister of Health, Roberto Speranza, really know? But above all: because the pandemic plan? If they had, would the massacre of last March been prevented? Most likely, these are the questions Bergamo prosecutors would have liked to ask the eleven researchers at the European Investment Office for Health and Development in Venice to see clearly. But in recent days, the Geneva leaders have invoked diplomatic immunity, preventing them from appearing before the magistrates headed by prosecutor Antonio Chiappani.
The earthquake at WHO
“I received pressure and threats of dismissal to modify the report and write that the pandemic plan dates back to 2016 and not 2006, as it is.”. Zambon, who coordinates the Venetian office that drafted the document, has little trouble saying it. And I probably would have said it in front of the p.m from Bergamo who have already called you at least three times (the last on December 10). The problem is that WHO leaders won’t let them do it. In the last hours the Farnesina has also intervened. Last Saturday, according to Massimo Giletti to It’s not the sandin fact, Chancellor Luigi Di Maio would have asked the World Health Organization to “consider the possibility of allowing officials and experts to consent to the prosecutor’s request to be heard as people informed of the facts”. In Geneva, however, the procedure did not have much effect. And if, on the one hand, the WHO has ensured that the document was withdrawn after that “factual inaccuracies were found” and that the goal was “to correct errors and republish”, on the other hand, has already taken the first steps by making Guerra jump the position that, in addition to working for the organization, is also part of Scientific technical committee so it is in close contact with the Ministry of Health.
[ad_2]
