[ad_1]
TURIN, ITALY – DECEMBER 12: Ignacio Pussetto of Udinese Calcio scores his team’s first goal during the Serie A match between Torino FC and Udinese Calcio at Stadio Olimpico di Torino on December 12, 2020 in Turin, Italy. Italy’s sports stadiums remain under strict restrictions due to the coronavirus pandemic, as government social distancing laws prohibit fans from entering venues, causing games to be played behind closed doors. (Photo by Valerio Pennicino / Getty Images)
El Toro has fallen again, even in his own home. This time it was Udinese who took the grenade at the Olimpico Grande Torino field, which since last July has not added the three points. Giampaolo’s men maintaining greater possession of the ball (59% in the grenade, compared to 41% for Juventus), greater precision in passing (84% to 81%) and a greater number of successful passes (491 to 298) They had less effect, conceding too much in the defensive phase and this is not the only fact that explains the umpteenth blow from Belotti and his teammates.
BUILDING – Grenade play was easily predictable for Gotti’s team. The Friulians in fact prevailed thanks to the 56 recoveries made, with which they blocked the most dangerous adverse actions at the root. A figure almost double compared to the 29 recoveries managed by Torino, who have encountered difficulties managing the Bianconeri counterattacks on several occasions. Toro created more numerically, but Udinese made better use of its opportunities. Belotti and his teammates attempted 36 attack actions reaching the shot 7 times, while the Friullan created 29 attack actions, reaching 9 shots.
RELIABILITY ‘– The defensive phase of Giampaolo’s men was completely insufficient. This is demonstrated by the fact that 8 of the 9 shots attempted by the Friulians started from within the penalty area. This, combined with the non-idyllic moment of Sirigu, defeated 0-2 by Musso, in terms of saves, meant that the 3 Juventus takeaways that hit the mirror got into the net, determining the final 2-3.
[ad_2]
