[ad_1]
Restrictive measures now – those launched by the last Dpcm – a few weeks of freedom before Christmas and then the almost certain probability of a new harsh confinement from mid-January: that’s how it would be, according to an unidentified chief of staff interviewed by the newspaper . Free, the government’s plan for the next few weeks in the face of the Covid pandemic.
The management of the Covid emergency highlighted political clashes and disagreements. “The pandemic is managed with the usual patterns of political struggle. Governors against government. Mayors against governors. Pieces of the majority against the majority. Pieces of opposition against the opposition ”. “And of course, but more by script than by conviction,” says the source about the political landscape.
Conte is aware that it is weak in this phase – he adds – and therefore “looks for banks”, both institutional and political. From here derives the war with the Regions and the “necessary and obligatory opening, to the now daily request of the Head of State” to the opposition. A move, the latter, “late and doomed to failure.”
Blocking perspective
Returning to the closures, according to the source we expect some jumpers a little wider at Christmas and tight again in January. So grit your teeth until the first days of December, reopen everything about the Immaculate Conception, guarantee a few weeks of consumption at Christmas, only to be able to reverse and close everything in the second half of January.
The mistakes of the government and the regions
Both the first and second waves took everyone by surprise. But if last spring nobody knew what we were going to face, now things are different: we knew since the summer of a possible flashback of the virus, but nothing has been done. “In the ministries, many have lowered their guard thinking that it is over. It would have been necessary to use July and August to prepare for the worst, not to go to the beach, ”said the source.
The same source revealed that in August the tracking system “was already failing” and that “a third of the outbreaks escaped” monitoring. “It was enough to read the scientific and health reports that circulated in the ministry, not those of the press conferences. But the Regions had no problems allowing discotheques to open, ”continued the anonymous chief of staff.
The government, which had blocked a Calabrian ordinance on outdoor bar tables a few weeks earlier, did not challenge the nightclub ordinances (which Lazio TAR would have strictly suspended). Instead, he was concerned about intervening in the return infections of travelers from Spain and Greece. In the discos the executive intervened late, “when the damage was done.” A massive blockade, at least until now, would not have been done so much for economic reasons (“now everything is done with debt”) as for an “evaluation of the psychosocial resilience of Italians.”
[ad_2]