[ad_1]
If all goes as it seems, the new commander in chief of the West should arrive at the royal headquarters of the White House in the trembling disguise of Joe biden; the octogenarian who Donald trump – in the usual malevolence – she had nicknamed him “sleepy.”
At this point exhaustion should end. And only a power-worshiping hardened singer like Bruno Vespa You might find the indecent spectacle offered by the American election exciting: the clash between a petty third-rank politician and a long-term politician, at best an elderly Jimmy Carter, and a mythomaniac infantilized, liar and narcissistic, adding Doctor Strangelove’s tremendous doomsday touch to a large gallery of blanks: from Ronald Reagan George Bush jr. Puppets to which the ultra-right ventriloquists have given the floor and the most reactionary strategies (from time to time: the cunning James Baker, the very bad Dick Cheney, the delusional Steve Bannon).
but still we are still amazed. It could be done without considering what the DNA of the “land of the free stars and stripes” is, from the moment the New World experiment and its mythology began. And as the last facts that we have seen, they were commissioned to confirm.
The confederation of the 13 colonies, which in 1789 gave rise to the United States of America, is an extraordinary invention of the so-called Founding Fathers, whose most significant nucleus was made up of large landowners (Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, John Adams), creating – as Columbia University historian Howard Zinn wrote – “the system of control more effective than modern times and showing future generations of leaders the advantages that come from associating paternalism with leadership ”. That is, “the harbinger of an enduring feature of American politics, which has often seen upper-class politicians harness the energy of the lower classes to pursue their own ends.” Those Founding Fathers who spoke republic, never about democracy.
Born as a colonial plutocracy, what is systematically defined as the first modern democracy has continued to grow and consolidate as a two-tier regime: the visible and the apparent, with the benevolent aspect of “Land of the free”; the one behind – shady – the strategy to keep the working classes at bay for the benefit of the proprietary classes. So it was at the end of the 18th century; it still is today, as the Speaker of the House of Representatives astutely declares Nancy pelosi documentary maker Michael Moore from Fahrenheit 11/9: “We are all capitalists.” Or rather, the ideology of possessive sacredness is the element that cement the entire American political class, making it indistinguishable in its ultimate ends.
In any case, we will differentiate ourselves in how to sell ourselves, understanding that the contents of the product are absolutely same. Whether Democrats or Republicans, the dark side of the ancient experiment born “among the majestic redwoods of New England” (Tocqueville) remains. unchanged. So for some we write “progressive” but we read “leopard”; “Populists” for others, when it comes only to “demagogues.” It says “freedom” but it means “property.” With a continuous game of parts, especially for so-called reformers.
So that Bill clinton it is the president who definitively sells the legacies of the only truly democratic experiment – the New Deal – by liquidating the instruments of financial control (Glass-Steagall Act of 1933) and lending a hand to financial globalization; the newly elected president Barack Obama he goes to Cairo to address the Egyptian democratic students, and then confirms the free hand of the guardian generals of the oil business. Perhaps the president could even be demystified John F. Kennedy, shot to death by a mysterious sniper in Dallas, in light of his billionaire father’s bizarre gangster collusion.
American power and politics as a game of deceptive mirrors, in which Nothing is what it seems. Even if great illusionists sometimes have the luxury of revealing the trick. James Madison, the future fourth president of the United States, wrote in a private letter to Jefferson in 1787: “divide and conquer, the reprehensible axiom of tyranny, is sometimes the only policy that can allow the administration of a Republic ”.
[ad_2]
