[ad_1]
AGI – “With the ministers in the streets it does not end well.” The precedent evoked by Andrea Orlando dates back 13 years: it was in October 2007 when the ministers and undersecretaries of the People’s Republic of China took to the streets to demand a new welfare state. Romano Prodi’s government fell shortly after. Therefore, Giuseppe Conte is authorized to perform the necessary spells.Although in this case there is no place – and God forbid, given the current crisis and restrictions – but the degree of tension in the majority is still very high.
The controversy sparked, after a jumble of press releases from Italia Viva MPs: it was former Prime Minister Matteo Renzi who published a particularly fiery Enews in which he announced that he will ask the Prime Minister to change the newly released Dpcm. In his publication, Renzi seems to put himself in the shoes of his compatriot Gino Bartali, when he said “everything is wrong, everything is to be done”. For Renzi, from measures on restaurants to cinemas and theaters, from schools to transportation, the decree shows gaps that would suggest a provision “without scientific basis”.
This week’s newshttps: //t.co/rpmAWgdkDS
– Matteo Renzi (@matteorenzi) October 26, 2020
“While sacrifices are (still) being called for, it would be very useful, in my opinion, for the government to explain to us on what scientific data and analysis decisions are made: scientific data, not the emotions of a single minister,” he writes. the leader of Iv. Specifically, “the closure of restaurants at 6 pm” for Renzi “is technically inexplicable, it seems a measure taken without any scientific basis”.
The attack by the leader of Italia viva is particularly harsh by the closure of cinemas and theaters. Renzi’s viewer frames Dario Franceschini, Minister of Culture and head of delegation of the ruling Democratic Party: “It caught my attention that the Minister of Culture justified the closure by saying that lives must be saved. I say that it is enough to have gone to the movies or to the theater, in recent weeks, to understand that there are no places where you run the risk of dying ”.
Words, those of Renzi, who follow the minister’s position: “I have the impression that the seriousness of the crisis has not been perceived. The risks of infections have not been perceived at this time.To defend Franceschini there is also the deputy Pd, Enrico Borghi: “The next day, it seems that the Dpcm has no parents. The only one who has had a straight back to defend him, in a video in which he is aware of provoking the ire of a sector with high media coverage, has been the Minister of Culture Dario Franceschini ”.
A frontal attack on the government and Conte that, in any case, Renzi underlines that he continues to support. An attack that comes, perhaps not in vain, a few minutes after the intervention of Nicola Zingaretti in the national administration. The dem leader understands that the moment does not allow for hesitation or diplomacy and responds with determination: “Having your feet in two directions at this moment is ethically intolerable.”
A judgment, therefore, that goes beyond the political and affects the ethical sphere. Because, Zingaretti explains, “we are in a dramatic turn in the history of Italy. I see many distinctions on the part of government representatives or majority forces, even political initiatives that I consider incomprehensible: I think those parties that, in the evening, they sit at the government tables and in the morning they organize opposition to the decisions takenThe secretary then addresses the ally with words generally reserved for opposition leaders: “Anger and fears must be answered, not handled.”
Fears such as those manifested by the Treviso restaurateur whose photograph, which shows him slumped in a chair in front of his restaurant, has now become the symbol of the suffering of many entrepreneurs. We must take the concern and despair of that entrepreneur and say that we are the ones who want to come back to life. We must accompany the entrepreneur from Treviso from solitude, but also from Palermo, Rome or Naples. Even science will not have won, we must resist and help ”.
Faced with the ‘friendly fire’ coming from the ranks of Italia Viva, Zingaretti played the card of sharing, also calling the social forces and the opposition to the table. The stakes, on the other hand, are too high for only the majority, or part of it, to bear the honor and burden of the decisions that must be made. “We need a new climate to save the common good.”
“We must quickly see if a higher convergence point can be found to salvage the situation. That is why it is importantor really involve the social forces, with the intermediate bodies. And also political oppositions: ways must be found to take the relationship between the majority and the opposition one step further. “Of course,” you cannot ask the majority to declare itself defeated, because it is not true, “Zingaretti emphasizes : “But it is not only possible to ask the opposition to share or sign the decisions taken by the majority. We need a point of equilibrium. “
A solution that would also be useful to deactivate the Renzians in a phase in which the elections imposed by the eighth on the coronavirus promise not to repeat the ‘tonic’ effect on the government seen with the first wave, as Maurizio Martina also seems to underline: ” All the political forces have the categorical imperative to work together now, each one from their majority or minority positions. No one can think of electorally profiting from an unprecedented situation like this. “
[ad_2]
