Juventus-Napoli, the sports judge: the 3-0 decision at the table and a penalty spot for the blues

He writes on the device, which is called to assess “only the possible existence, only for sporting purposes and, therefore, the application of federal regulations reasons of force majeure, by order of no-show in Turin “and does so on the basis of the” arbitration report. “According to the judge, the case of” force majeure “is not integrated.

In practice, it did not identify the cause of force majeure due to the lack of presence of the team of Gattuso in Turin. “The responsibility for the implementation of the protocols provided by the FIGC for the containment of the Covid epidemic rests with Naples and, therefore, this company has no competition,” reads the email from the ASL 1 of Naples .

«It is prohibited – continues – to this judge any assessment of the legitimacy (and, even more, of any possible form of non-application), of acts and measures, in the form it adopts, by the state and territorial health authorities, as well asé of the regional authorities, implemented to protect the health of individuals and the community.

It is recalled that the De Laurentiis club after the positivity of Zielinski ed Elmas he had not gone to Turin claiming that he had been blocked in Capodichino by the ASL. Asl Napoli 2 Nord limited itself to clarifying the need for fiduciary home isolation for 14 days and the impossibility for close contacts to leave the national territory. Therefore, for Mastrandrea the framework was not incompatible with the rules established in the FIGC protocol and therefore with the possibility of playing the match in Turin.

further the complaint proposed by Napoli Regarding the regularity of the race, it will be considered inadmissible. The controversy will continue, but the indication of the sports judge and therefore of the football world is to try to play by applying the protocol avoiding shortcuts.