‘Government dragged to court’. The case explodes in the anti-Covid plan



[ad_1]

The only certain thing are two: the great chaos generated by the executive and his experts; and the next call from government, under the guise of the Ministry of Health, in a courtroom. The story is complex, and it starts from afar, but in short it is about that famous “National anti-Covid plan”Of which there has been talk since April, which has heated up the already hot media summer and which still has a court in the Montecitorio palace.

Short summary. In April Andrea Urbani, director of the Ministry of Health and member of the Cts, give an interview to Corriere della Sera in which he assures that in the early stages of the emergency everyone complied with a “classified plan“Very precise, containing figures on infections to be scary. The effect is disturbing. The governors know nothing and protest. The media asks Roberto Speranza, who immediately begins to dismiss it as a simple” prognostic study. ” summary, no plan: just an analysis.

The issue seems to be there. In May, however, some reporters access the proceedings and the ministry send you another study, the one prepared by Stefano merler, and for a time the two documents are confused. Speranza insists that there is no real response “Plan” and that it is really just a prognostic analysis or little else. That document, on the other hand, is there, so much so that it will eventually be published by Messenger Service, and is titled “National Health Plan in Response to a Possible Covid-19 Pandemic Emergency.” The chaos, however, is absolute, in some places even mysterious, and is reconstructed, with unpublished revelations, in Coronavirus Black Book (click here) posted by Historical editions. In fact, the CTS minutes mention the “Plan” on several occasions and its approval, which dates back to March 2, is ten days after the Merler report was presented. Inside are indications on how to react to a possible infection: stock up on masks, increase intensive care, increase hospital beds. The government assures that it has not secreted it and that the confidentiality was requested by the CTS, however it made a decisive decision: that is, it decided not to share it with the regions. “A plan of health emergency we certainly have not received it ”, reveals in Black book Vittorio Demicheli, member of the Lombard working group. Like them, not even the parliamentarians have seen it, although they demand it loudly.

In fact, in April the Fdi deputy, Galeazzo bignami, access the documents to obtain the circulars and the plan mentioned by Urbani in the famous interview. You get the first one, but in the “Plan” you don’t get a response. In August he tries again, this time with his colleague. Marcello Gemmato. “They didn’t even answer us,” Bignami explains to Giornale.it. “Even then we imagined that in the fall we would reach this point, with the government abusing its powers to handle the pandemic. If these measures are based on some ‘plan’, we want to see it ”. After the 30-day period within which the public administration must respond to civic access, the parliamentarians decide to initiate the appeal to the TAR. “We are not challenging the refusal to hand over the document – insists the deputy FdI – but the fact that they didn’t even answer us. If they have something to hide, they will have to say it. If they have nothing to hide, they will have to give us the document. “

The audience has already been notified. The plaintiffs challenge the “illegitimacy of the silence kept” by the ministry and ask the judge to condemn the administration to publicize the “Plan”. “We take the government to court – says Bignami – because it is inadmissible for it to hide data, information, news that it then imposes on the Italians DPCM over DPCM with measures that are to say the least questionable. Conte wants a leap of faith? At least clarify with the parliamentarians and give them the documents. Gemmato, that is to say, is also secretary of the XII Commission of Social Affairs and Health of the Chamber of Deputies: he has not had the opportunity to read anything and now he believes that he has a “specific interest” in having the “Plan” delivered.

In the end, there are two options. Or the “Plan” in the ministry that they don’t have, “and then it’s worse.” Or the two applicants will receive the same deed published by Messenger Service. “If they gave it to the first journalists of area that the deputies take seriously – concludes Bignami – Because we are the ones who are called to vote on behalf of and on behalf of the Italian people ”.

[ad_2]