[ad_1]
Poland-Italy 0-0
POLAND
Fabianski 6: used very little, when questioned, it responds present.
Kedziora 5.5: he lets Emerson escape and risks committing a penalty, he remedies it with great experience.
Glik 6.5: old lion, defend and answer almost everything. Benevento can sleep easy.
Walukiewicz 6.5: together with his partner, he leaves the crumbs to the blue forwards. A promise that they have cultivated in Cagliari.
Bereszynski 6– Does not suffer from the speed of the Blue Outsiders, opposing first Chiesa and then Kean.
Krychowiak 5.5: brain of the Polish midfield, plays as a breakwater and commands in the defensive phase. But on that offense he’s really too slow.
Moder 6.5: a lot of wood in midfield, he is asked for this and he does it well.
Szymanski 6: pushes the range of competition, does not create great dangers but makes its presence felt. (from 59 ‘ Grosicki 5.5: fresh from a triplet, it does not attract attention).
Klich 5.5: not incisive as in Leeds, however, he is the one with the most technique behind Lewandowski and it shows. (from 70 ‘ Property 5: enter but no one notices)
Jozwiak 6: Dark offensive midfielder, he works hard on Jorginho fouling several balls and avoiding restarts. (from 81 Karbownik All)
Lewandowski 5: you see little, it affects even less. He is not the champion we have learned to admire with Bayern Munich and also with Poland. Misty. (from 81 ‘ Linetty 6.5: close to dialing despite a few minutes)
Everybody. Must 6– Hard and difficult to deal with equipment, however (poor) quality can be further improved.
ITALY
Donnarumma 6.5:
Always responds present when asked. Poland is never really dangerous, but it is always ready
Florenzi 5: Never in a game is it difficult to notice it among the 22 on the field.
Bonucci 5.5: Lewandowski always looks for space behind him and fights in the first 45 ‘. It grows in the second half where with the help of Acerbi it can better withstand the Polish impact.
Acerbi 6.5: Unlike his colleague in the department, he is more prepared in the interdiction phase, often and willingly also frees himself in support of midfield and does not lose a head duel.
Emerson 6.5: He never plays for Chelsea and it is difficult to understand why. He pushes with a firm step, touches the goal, he is always proactive, but without forgetting the fundamental defensive diagonals. An additional indication for the January market?
Stretcher 6: He is the equalizer of the celestial midfield and many times he is the one who acts as a filter against the defense. Compared to recent performances, however, he lacks a lot in the editing phase where his talent is not seen. It comes out exhausted.
(from 79 ‘Locatelli 6 More lucid than Barella, he handles the ball better in midfield).
Jorginho 5: He misses too many bloody balls near his own area. Luckily for him, Poland does not take advantage of it, but it is in one of those games where it is more harmful than useful.
Verratti 5 He also fails to participate and the blue circle at the edge of the area often disappears unaffected. He’s supposed to be the driver, but he’s truly absent tonight.
Church 4.5: It is not peaceful and it shows. It is difficult for him to dialogue with his teammates, he hardly manages to do anything, often tripping over the ball and devouring a goal already made in two steps.
(dal 70 ‘Kean 6.5 His entry gives liveliness to a hitherto boring attack. However, he is also inaccurate in the last 18 meters where he prefers to pass the shot)
Belotti 6: Usual generosity, but too clumsy inside the penalty area where he misses in the goal area. It is strange that the most dangerous crosses come from his feet and are not for him.
(from 81 ‘Caputo sv)
L. Pellegrini 6: He starts off badly by making a lot of balls too simple for someone like him. He does not collapse and on the contrary grows becoming the most dangerous man of the Azzurri during the entire first half. Too bad the goal fails, I had to do better in front of goal.
(from 81 ‘Berardi sv)
Everybody. Mancini 5: This time his Italy struggles to fit in and Poland’s physicality suffers in the offensive half where the blue ball often struggles to become opportunities. The decision not to use Immobile from 1 ‘does not pay and the changes are also late, given the offensive aridity of the start of the second half.
[ad_2]