[ad_1]
Even today shouldn’t be a good day to decide Sports judge about Juventus-Naples with the non-presentation of the Azzurri in the Stadium and the 3-0 risk at the table. A feeling that had already found confirmation in the last hours. Judge Mastrandrea could request an additional investigation also because Napoli’s “pre-appeal” foresees the delivery of the briefs by the parties with the inevitable postponement of a few hours, if not a few days: it might even come on friday.
Nor should the parallel path followed by the FIGC be underestimated, with the investigation of the possible violation in the management of positivity by the blue club. Napoli has already sent a report to the Prosecutor’s Office explaining how all the procedures have been respected: the protocol provides an “agreed structure” where to go to the withdrawal following the positivity of a cardholder but, upon request to the competent ASL, it can be issued a permit quarantine at home. The FIGC prosecutor will have to understand if this process was followed to the letter of the club after Zielinski’s first positivity.
Therefore, respect for protocol comes to the fore again and It is not excluded that the investigation will be extended and see if the other teams that have found positive results among members in the last few weeks have followed the protocol perfectly.
If for Napoli, or for other clubs, deficiencies are found in the application of the procedure, the sanctions ranging from the warning to the penalty would be activated. For this reason, even if the 3-0 did not start at the table and the game had to be played, Napoli would still run the risk of being penalized with one or more points. Obviously, you could appeal, both after the Sports Judge’s decision and after the FIGC investigation.
