“The coronavirus is artificial, nobody tells the truth”

It is not the first time that he says this, his theory has many aspects “that do not add up”. But he continues undaunted on his way. “We are not dealing with a virus derived from a natural pathogen, but with a artificial virus, developed and launched by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a maximum security laboratory that is placed under the control of the Chinese Communist Party ”. The truth Li-Meng Yan, virologist, first signatory of the Yan Report (a 26-page work on the coronavirus), convinced that “a lethal virus has been created to spread it without being able to trace the perpetrators.”

Li-Meng Yan: “The new coronavirus is artificial”

The virologist claims to have started the investigation on Covid-19 “on December 31 last”, before the Chinese authorities officially announced the first confirmed case on January 7, which dates from November 16 “and specifies that she was carrying out the su research “in the laboratory of the World Health Organization at the University of Hong Kong.” She worked until spring at the Department of Public Health, University of Hong Kong. Now she is in New York, living “under the protection of the government. of the United States “.

“Nobody tells the truth. The Chinese government, the WHO, the scientific world – he says – I have studied the Sars-Cov-2 genome and that cell kit does not exist in nature. It is very similar to a virus in the possession of a laboratory of military research, a Sars-like-Cov isolated years ago, named Zc45 / Zxc21 “. “In my article I explain in detail the procedure followed by the Wuhan Institute of Virology to modify this coronavirus. Some parts have been added, exchanged, modified ”, he says, with the aim of“ making it look like a new virus ”. On the other hand, “the region of the virus that characterizes Sars-Cov-2 infection, called Rbm, closely resembles that of the Sars-Cov-1 virus, responsible for the Sars epidemic” in 2003.

Finally, “a Sars-Cov-2 protein called Spike exists at a furin cleavage site that is missing in all other coronaviruses similar to this one.” And, he says, “this characteristic of the new coronavirus suggests that Covid-19 is not natural, but was created artificially.” There is more. “The techniques used to create Covid-19 had been used since 2008 by a research group coordinated by Dr. Zhengli Shi from the Wuhan laboratory – he says – And the fact that the Rbm region itself has been modified by Dr. Shi and his collaborators is the smoking gun, the proof that Sars-Cov-2 is the product of genetic manipulation ”.

Because the SARS-COV-2 coronavirus was not created in the laboratory

Because Sars-CoV-2 is not artificial

Li-Meng Yan is not an unskilled conspiracy theorist, but the co-author of a couple of studies published in recent months in “Lancet” and “Nature,” two of the most authoritative journals in the scientific field. But his considerations about the origin of the virus have drawn criticism from many scholars. For Carl Bergstrom, a leading biologist at the University of Washington and co-author of a book on scientific disinformation, this is “strange and baseless” work.

“In its current form, you can’t give the work credibility,” Andrew Preston, a pathogenesis scientist at the University of Bath in the UK, told Newsweek. According to Preston, Li-Meng Yan’s work is simply “not backed by data,” it is extremely weak work “that, like a huge house of cards, is based on some assumptions that, once discredited, cause everything to collapse miserably. . “narrative system”.

“Lab-made virus” theories have continued to proselytize on the web. The thesis is suggestive, but so far no evidence has been presented that it is. Since the beginning of 2020, experts have studied the genomes of Sars-CoV-2 and related viruses and compared the gene for a key protein in the infectious process, a protein from the outer envelope of the virus (called a ‘spike’, spike or spine ). it needs to adhere to, enter, and infect human cells. Spike is equipped with a ‘molecular hook’ (called the RBD portion) with which the virus attaches itself to human cells by attaching itself to the ‘Ace2’ molecule (an important receptor in regulating blood pressure). The link between Rbd and Ace2 is essential to initiate the infection. In addition, Spike also has a ‘molecular scissor’ that helps the virus to penetrate the human cell. The link between Rbd and Ace2 is so perfect (Rbd fits Ace2 perfectly like a key with its lock or two pieces of a puzzle), that it can only be the result of natural selection and not the product of engineering. genetics, according to the vast majority of scientists. But conspiracy theories are always fascinating and will continue to dominate until the end of the pandemic.

“Coronavirus? Created in the laboratory”: what’s wrong with Li-Meng Yan’s theory?