[ad_1]
The confrontation is in the soft quarantine provided by the protocol. The ASL of Naples does not believe that there are extremes to soft quarantine. The case of Genoa
the president of the Lega Serie A Dal Pino
La Gazzetta dedicates a page to the confrontation between state laws, in this case between the FIGC protocol (approved by the Ministry of Health) and the Regions. Speaking of Napoli who did not go to Turin to play against Juventus, of course. This is what he writes:
The FIGC protocol establishes a limit in the application of the rules: “According to the Health and Government Authorities, the type of tests and the frequency of controls to be presented by the Squadra Group may be subject to variations with respect to current “. In practice, it is the health authority that can decide both on the measures to be taken, on the number of tampons, and on the isolation methods. When there is a positive, the clubs contact the ASL of reference and comply with its provisions. It happened in the case of the Genoa outbreak and it is also happening in Naples. The health authorities are responsible for the provisions on sanitation of environments (training centers) after the case or cases of positivity.
Add that
The Genoa case changed these practices given the magnitude of the outbreak and something similar happened in Naples.
Everything revolves around the circular of the Ministry of Health of 6/18/2020. This is the “source” that supports the decisions of the CTS and its yes to soccer protocol. (…) In this way, A was prevented from starting over with the sword of Damocles to “stop everything” in case of positivity. Quarantining team groups would put you at risk in a positive first moment for the entire system. Instead, the circular approved the soft quarantine. The clash of versions about the postponement of Juve-Napoli focuses on this: the ASL communication refers to the June 18 circular, but evidently it does not believe that there are extremes for the soft quarantine.
[ad_2]
