Suárez case: interceptions, Paratici and Juve

How did you come up with the idea of ​​choosing the University for Foreigners of Perugia for the Luis Suárez “sham exam” in Italian? In the investigation of the Perugia Prosecutor’s Office, this issue is gaining more and more prominence. Yesterday we learned about the broadening of the investigation spectrum that now concerns not only “falsehood” and “disclosure of professional secrecy”, but also corruption, better the “concurrence in corruption” mentioned in the guarantee notice for the rector Giuliana Grego Bolli and the general director of the Simone Olivieri University.

HURRY AND CHAMPIONS

–

And in one of the intercepted conversations Olivieri mentions the name of Juventus’ top manager, Fabio Paratici. “Juventus is in a hurry,” is the recorded phrase. But prosecutors are very cautious and no person attributable to the company is being investigated, and Selvaggio Sarri himself, the lieutenant colonel who has led the investigative work of the Guardia di Finanza in recent weeks (since yesterday, however, he moved to another position), had Two days ago he spoke of “absence of pressure” explaining instead of a university “bewitched by the possibility of future relations with Juventus”. A phrase illustrated in an interception that “with him we won the Champions” pronounced by the same teacher in charge of preparing Suárez for the exam.

ROUTE

–

It all would have started anyway at the other university in town. This is what the “Corriere della sera” rebuilt this morning, collecting the testimony of Maurizio Oliviero, rector of the state. It is he who tells of having received a phone call from the Juve squad about the possibility of being able to take the Italian test to reach the B1 level necessary to obtain Italian citizenship. At that moment, Oliviero points to the University for Foreigners and speaks with the Rector and the Director General. “After that I didn’t know anything else.” After questioning, the rector said that he received a “courtesy call” from Paratici, “the player’s entourage was very satisfied with the welcome received.” Oliviero is not being investigated and will be heard by prosecutors in the coming days.

LACK OF LOYALTY

–

As for the sporting reflections of the criminal investigation, the request to Perugia from the Football Federation Prosecutor’s Office to dispose of the documents will be formalized at this time. The Public Ministry must respond positively to the papers that are not at risk of “evidentiary contamination.” Sports law experts are quite cautious and believe that the situation is still too developed to be able to hypothesize the challenge to Juventus of a sports offense. If on the one hand there is a specific article, 32, approved after the Passaportopoli of 2001, which punishes “forgery” or “alteration” to violate membership, in the state of the art the possibility of acting on the basis of the Article 4 (ex Article 1) on “lack of loyalty”.