Pensions, from 99 to 102: the possible changes



[ad_1]

Where we are with him pension reform? Next Friday the government and social partners will meet to discuss the future of Quota 100. The positions are currently very distant although, unlike the unions, the executive has not yet fully discovered their letters, limiting itself to denying the rumors circulated in the newspapers in recent weeks. The truth is that due to the same admission of various members of the government to the Pd quota, the reform that Retirement At 62, with 38 years of contributions, he is condemned to oblivion. And inevitably, the reform that is approved will have to weigh less in the coffers of the INPS.

Pensions, the (unattainable) proposal of the unions

For their part, the unions have never hidden their desire to reach Quota 41. The proposal of the social partners basically foresees the possibility that all pensioners leave their jobs with 41 years of paid contributions, regardless of their age. It goes without saying that the problem with such reform is cost, which is absolutely unsustainable in the coming years. Therefore, the government and the unions must necessarily reach an agreement starting from very distant positions.

The proposal on the table: the double track

According to “Sole 24 Ore”Always very informed about the pension scenarios, the government will come to the table with a fairly precise idea. The idea is to allow only those who do heavy work to have the opportunity to leave the job at 62 (or 63), while for others we are talking about an exit threshold of 64 years and 37 (or 38) years of contributions . .

Currently, thanks to the Social Ape, heavy workers can enjoy a subsidy from the age of 63. with 30 (or 36) years of contributions, a slip into the retirement pension. As of 2022, according to rumors from the newspaper Confindustria, they could retire from work without a pension ticket as long as they have paid a certain amount of contributions.

Retired at 62 or 64

In summary. According to the “Sun” account, the proposal provides for a double exit.

Your browser cannot play the video.

You have to disable ad blocking to play the video.

Turn off the soundTurn off the soundTurn off the soundTurn on the audio


stain

Enable full screenTurn off full screen

Can not play video. Try again later.

Wait a minute...

Maybe you might be interested...

You need to enable javascript to play the video.

  1. Workers who carry out burdensome activities: they will have the opportunity to leave their job at 62 (or 63) years old with a seniority of 37 (or 36) years “without excessive penalties.”
  2. All other workers: they will be able to leave their job at 63 or 64 years and at least 37 (or 38) years of contributions, but accepting a cut (yet to be quantified) in the contribution part of the subsidy.

It goes without saying that those who do not qualify will have to wait for the 67-year old-age pension. These are the hypotheses on the table so far. We will know more only at the end of the week.

Thus, subzero GDP will cut our pensions.

[ad_2]