[ad_1]
The lawyer Mario Stagliano, an expert in sports law, spoke through the microphones of the Suono Sport 101.5 Center during the broadcast of “Bordero”. These are his words:
What has changed with the new regulation and what was the mistake?
In 2018 the regulations changed and the older than 18 became like the older than 22, and it was also mandatory to communicate the number of players’ shirts. The mistake was to point out Diawara, born in 1997, as a player who needed a jersey included in the B list, when in fact he was included in the more than 22 and presented as a player to be used.
Now what will happen technically?
There will certainly be problems. With sports justice, anything can happen, making a prediction is very difficult. I don’t know what exactly happened in the league or at the club, but I can tell you that the two lists should be compared immediately. Technically, it should now be assigned 3-0 to the table.
But in this case, shouldn’t Hellas Verona have filed the appeal within 24 hours after the match?
No, because it is not a problem of regularity in the participation of the players. It’s like he’s an unregistered footballer.
This error, despite not having given Roma an advantage, can it be a valid defense?
I don’t know, it seems to me the only possible defense. That Rome did not benefit from this story is true, but I believe that such an error is not even in the second category.
Tomorrow will be the measure and you can reserve 2-3 days for the first grade measure. After that, Rome has a maximum of 7 days to challenge the provision and in 15 days it will end before the Court of Appeal.
[ad_2]
