[ad_1]
Green light from the Court of Aosta to the lawyer Carlo Taormina to continue with the foreclosure of the villa in Cogne. In fact, judge Paolo De Paola has rejected the requests of Annamaria Franzoni and her husband Stefano lorenzi, of suspension of the real estate execution. The dispute arises from the civil sentence handed down in a final judgment in Bologna where the woman, already convicted of the murder of her son Samuele, which occurred in the house of Montroz, a village in Cogne, in January 2002 and for which she turned 16 , the former lawyer owes him more than 275 thousand euros for non-payment of defense fees, which amounted to approximately 450 thousand in the deed of attachment.
Cogne, Taormina seizes the house of Annamaria Franzoni
Cogne, Taormina wants to seize the villa: “Annamaria Franzoni never paid me”
Taormina and Anna Maria Franzoni are still in dispute over fees never paid for 770 thousand euros
Taormina, assisted by his son Giorgio, has seized in recent months the only asset that can be attacked, which is half of the real estate where Franzoni, now a resident of the Bolognese Apennines, had returned for a few days once the freedom. Among other things, when opposing the procedure notified in January, Franzoni and Lorenzi, assisted by lawyers Maria Rindinella and Lorenza Parenti, argued that the house is not in foreclosure because it is part of an endowment fund, established in May 2009.
Argument rejected by the judge that underlines, in a 12-page order, that the constitution of the fund, made by Lorenzi as, at that time, his wife’s guardian, prohibited after the criminal conviction, can be linked to the Franzoni trial. who, due to his condition, could not meet the material and moral needs of the family. And linked to the needs of the family is also the debt contracted with Taormina for the defensive activity, since it is functional to obtain the possibility, for her, of returning to her loved ones as soon as possible. And if the debt has these characteristics, the fund cannot be a reason for opposition. At this point, the sale of the property can be ordered, although a judgment on the merits is pending, again in Aosta, which the judge invites to settle before October 30.
Last updated: 18:53 © REPRODUCTION RESERVED
[ad_2]
