but 8 billion are needed for the government plan



[ad_1]

Pensions, 102 check mark: but eight billion is needed for the government plan

Call the “Fee 102”, if you want. government Work on flexibility at the exit: tomorrow technicians and political representatives of the executive will meet with the unions for a first discussion on the rich. pension file. At the center of the discussions is the question of overcoming Quota 100 because in one year the halt to the experimental mechanism that currently allows you to go to rest with a minimum of 62 years of age and 38 contributions is likely to produce devastating effects (a 5-year ladder) against those who will not be able to retire taking advantage of this window and, instead, you will have to wait until age 67.

Pensions, the exit with 41 years on the table

Pensions, leaving at 62 but with the check cut: schedules and categories

ROADS

What to do? The government thinks of several solutions and the preferred one is to allow, since 2022, for those who want an early departure 64 years old with a minimum of 38 years of contributions (hence the name “Quota 102”), accepting a cut of 2.8-3% of the salary (introduced in 1996) for each year necessary to reach 67 years. That is, the ordinary retirement horizon. Calculations in hand, the reform would affect approximately 150 thousand people a year (in addition to the 350,000 who usually retire), who could thus leave their job 3 years earlier, renouncing an average of 5% of the treatment that would accrue upon retirement when complying with current legal requirements. This mechanism, however, could also become a tool to be used in conjunction with corporate crisis management buffers in the coming months, especially after the current brake on layoffs is lifted.

How much would Quota 102 cost to the State coffers? The practice in which the technicians of the Ministry of Labor are testing 8,000 million euros. Although it is necessary to specify that it would be an “accrual” and not cash outflow, destined to decrease in the coming years. From the point of view of the fund, the expenses would be equal to zero since the pensioners would see their treatments cut back, while the competence chapter would grow as the number of pensioners increased. The track of Quota 41 remains hot: unions believe that those who have reached that level of contribution should be able to retire regardless of age. Today this option is only possible for precocious workers who at the age of 19 were at least one year behind in paid contributions. And on this front, the government, which did not seem entirely convinced until a few weeks ago, is ready for dialogue.

THE OTHER FRONTS

Meanwhile, considering that the issue of exit flexibility will be the subject of a delegated law, the government must establish what interventions to include immediately in the next budget law. On this front, two extensions are planned: Ape Sociale me Woman option. The Social Ape allows certain categories of workers (unemployed, caregivers, 74% disabled, heavy workers) to retire at age 63, with 30 or 36 years of contributions, while the Woman Option is a form of early retirement reserved for the workers who as of December 31, 2019 have accumulated 35 years of contributions and an age equal to or greater than 58 years (for wage earners) and 59 years (for self-employed). It is planned to increase the time period for the requirements to accumulate by at least one year. Among the next innovations is the construction of a contributory guarantee pension for those who have discontinued careers and with low salaries, while the two technical commissions provided for by the latest Budget Law will soon be established: the one to assess the separation of social spending between assistance and social security. and that for the study of heavy work. Last updated: 21:45


© REPRODUCTION RESERVED



[ad_2]