[ad_1]
Roberto Serra / Iguana Press via Getty Images
“I will vote NO, because the YES is led by the 5-star Movement and I don’t want a YES victory to pass through a personal victory. They are a disaster. Incompetent, careless … and some are even bad. “
On the second part I confess that I agree moderately. But I can’t find the correct connection. It is as if I refuse to taste a dish because I don’t like the chef who cooked it. Also, I say it’s bad without even trying it. Well, I’m not like that.
“I will vote YES, because at least there will be less people stealing. “
I do not understand. It is defeatism. It is a ruthless but also suicidal judgment, typical of those who think that everyone is dishonest except themselves of course. The fact is that everyone judges with their own criteria. Whoever says that everyone in a certain position steals, unknowingly admits that if they were in that position it would be natural for them to steal.
“I will vote NO, because what is needed is something else. “
I can never agree with the benaltrists. As if after a week of involuntary fasting, dreaming of a great lunch of five extraordinary dishes, I was offered to eat only one appetizer plate. I would not reject it.
“I will vote YES, because now it is clear that many deputies and senators, after having voted almost unanimously for the reform, regretted it. I suspect that in the secret of the polls they will vote No. They want to save their jobs. “
The analysis does not seem out of place to me. It is the reaction that I do not understand. As if I was no longer going to eat somewhere because those who recommended it to me in the meantime have changed their minds. I find that relying on the inconsistency of others to make a decision is an understatement and shows a lack of personality.
“I will vote No because in the seventeenth century they could not guarantee the same level of representation of the territories. And then the savings are negligible, just $ 60 million. “
Of course? But aren’t the mayors, councilors, regional presidents and councilors (there are more than one hundred thousand) who represent and manage the territories? Are you sure that 600 cannot do what 900 do today, which are national laws? Are you sure 60 million is a negligible number? When you are in debt, no savings item can be considered insignificant.
“I will vote YES because I always vote Yes. I am in favor of change. ”
Right to be in favor of change, but when necessary. When it goes in the right direction. Maybe we could also make a square mortadella instead of a round one, to save some logistics. But is that the case?
“I’m going to vote NO because my party says to vote NO “
“I’m going to vote YES because my party says to vote YES “
This is the motivation that I dislike the least. I find confidence to be a great feeling. However, referendums exist precisely for citizens to express their personal position directly. Otherwise, the vote of the Chambers would suffice, where we are represented by the parties for which we vote. Therefore, even this justification does not convince me.
Damn, none of the reasons I heard in this election campaign has managed to lead me to make a decision. But it’s not her fault, I’m the one who’s wrong. I just can’t adapt to the common way of thinking. Sorry. So I decided to do something strange and I confess it to you. I went to read the text of the reform. It is not that long. It took me about half an hour. I also looked at the comparative tables of current figures and those that have been approved for reform, region by region.
Amazing. After reading the text I had an idea and finally decided why to vote. I am well aware that this is a method that may seem absurd. But that’s how I am, forgive me.
[ad_2]
