[ad_1]
His father Daniele’s lawyers have appointed a superconsultant in the field of traffic accidents: he will also examine the “Corsa” already examined by the police.
PALERMO. The dynamics of the accident on the road from which the mystery of Viviana and her little Gioele started – he disappeared and was later found dead in the steep terrain next to the Messina-Palermo tunnel where the collision had occurred – could be rewritten from top to bottom, even in their responsibilities. Everything is questioned, in reverse, in this case about which nothing has been clarified: how she died, how he died, when and why.
While the investigation of the autopsy examination of the scant remains of Gioele’s body continues, lawyers for Daniele Mondello (Viviana’s husband and Gioele’s father) have appointed a superconsult on traffic accidents, Carmelo Costa, who leads the team . of a company (Scisap) that deals in particular with fatal accidents and serious injuries. You will now examine the Opel Corsa – already screened by the Catania Scientific Police – that on August 3 was traveling near the town of Caronia and that around 9:30 in the morning collided with a company van. road worker.
The issue is to understand if the four-year-old boy – who used to travel standing in the back seat of the car without a seat belt – could have suffered serious injuries in the accident, which would support the hypothesis that Viviana, upset by the pain, was she committed suicide by throwing herself from the Enel pylon at the foot of which she was found dead, with unmistakable signs of falling. Certainly yes, as the forensics with Luminol revealed yesterday during the unrepeatable examinations arranged by the Patti Prosecutor’s Office and carried out in the Brolo garage where the car is kept, that there is not a drop of blood in the car, what the injury found in the The windshield was prior to the accident, and that the only witness who saw the mother and son subsequently flee in the field reported that the baby was alive, with his eyes open and his head resting on the woman’s head. . Even the three fingerprints forensics detected yesterday on the windshield, yet to be attributed with certainty, could mean nothing. They may not be from Joel, they may be from an earlier era. But they could also indicate that the boy, thrown from the back seat to the windshield, tried to protect himself from the impact. It will be really difficult to prove it.
Instead, more certain indications will arrive about what the technicians call “accident dynamics”, never clarified. Sure there is the collision that occurred in the tunnel while the truck was in motion (and did not stop as stated later) and that Viviana’s car, which had a tire blew out and broke a rear window. , has finished its journey inside the tunnel, and not outside, as some have argued, misinterpreting the signs of a braking on the asphalt that instead belongs to another vehicle.
From there, Viviana, a woman who suffered from psychiatric disorders and was afraid of being persecuted, walked away towards the tunnel exit, with the child, while the two passengers in the van only saw “a female shadow” attentive to communications . ‘they were going to report the incident with the triangle, as the magistrates declared. Everything else, even the actual responsibility of the woman in the fight, is yet to be clarified. Did the car zigzag? Did the accident actually occur in an attempt to pass the truck? Was the truck driving in your lane? Did Viviana’s car spin? Was it a minor accident as said for days when the traffic police found the car? Or will the bodywork, the tires, the engine, the marks on the rail and on the asphalt tell a different story? The consultant will say this, joining the ranks of professionals who work on the poor bones of the child.
