[ad_1]
Positive, but asymptomatic? No smart job. Not even if it’s okay and you can do it in isolation from your home. The prescription, which equates the positivity of the Coronavirus to the disease always and in any case, provided for by the decrees and circulars of the confinement, runs the risk of becoming a real boomerang in these weeks of resumption of the infection. Personal (including salary) and professional costs for individuals, companies and the Italian economy and the INPS funds, derived from a rule of this nature, can be exponential in the face of the second wave of autumn infections . And so many people are pointing fingers at a state rule …
Positive, but asymptomatic? No smart job. Not even if it’s okay and you can do it in isolation from your home. There prescription, which equates the positivity of the coronavirus to disease always and in any case, provided for in the decrees and closure circulars, is likely to become a real boomerang in these weeks of resumption of contagion. Personal (including salary) and professional costs for individuals, companies and the Italian economy and the INPS funds, derived from a rule of this nature, can be exponential in the face of the second wave of autumn infections . And many point with the index finger a rule of Hyper-wellbeing state and one of yours is requested review or a more flexible interpretation of it.
The ISS: “Rt index at 1.18. Asymptomatic patients increase”
The proposal of Anna Maria Parente, president of the Senate health commission, but also responsible for work and welfare of Italia Viva: “It is a question on which to reflect precisely a glance at autumn. quarantine Until now it has been equated with disease because the right to health is paramount in the event of an epidemic. But legislators must always find a Balance between the right to work and the right to health, both constitutionally provided. And then a solution could be that, before doctor’s authorization, you can allow remote work for those who are positive but do not develop symptoms. I hope in this way of confrontation between the social partners, represented by businessmen and workers ”.
Covid, positive but asymptomatic? It is forbidden to work even with smart work.
Insists on the negative effects of the inability to work intelligently for asymptomatic positives Emmanuele Massagli, president of Adapt: ”It is a question of assessing whether a real situation of indisposition that prevents job performance due to the weakness of the subject or the risks that working from home could have on the person’s body. In fact, no situation occurs: infected Completely asymptomatic, he is able to work and if he does, he does not put his health at risk. You would endanger that of your colleagues if you went to the workplace; therefore, their involvement in smart work is discussed. But this is not possible today. And therefore it is a question of intervening. “The reason is clear:” The risk is to meet in autumn with hundreds of thousands of people standing at home and unable to work. One more piece in the restart of our country, which promises to be very slow.
A concept he strongly insists on Maurizio Del Conte, Bocconian labor lawyer, first president of Anpal: “Working on yourself in smart work is not a risk factor. The rule must be changed in the interests of the worker, the company and the country. ‘idea that resources are infinite, but this is suicide as a perspective ”.
And the argument in favor of remote work of asymptomatic positives focuses precisely on the ethical-social level Marco Bentivogli, ex-leader of the Fim Cisl, author of the recent essay Independent, guide to intelligent work: “You need individual responsibility and trust in people if you do not want to kill the instrument in the cradle. You cannot look, as in the norm aforementioned, with a perspective based on the work of the 20th century “.
© All rights reserved
