[ad_1]
The number of patients admitted to intensive care after contracting the coronavirus is growing. There are 107 in all of Italy, 13 more in the space of 24 hours. A clear increase if we take into account that on July 29 the Ministry of Health reported only 38, only 2 in Sicily. On the island, on the other hand, serious patients have grown so much that now there are 10, the second most serious number after Lombardy with 21.
To the 107 patients who are in intensive care throughout Italy we must add the 1,380 hospitalized with symptoms (+92 compared to Monday) and the 25,267 in home isolation. In total, therefore, ongoing infections affect 26,754 people (+676 compared to two days ago).
Clear growth, alarming at first glance the Sicilian figure, which nevertheless needs to be analyzed further. According to experts, in fact, some patients are not so serious, but they are assisted in intensive care only because they need non-invasive supportive ventilation. Therefore, the number of infected people who need intubation on the island would be in line with the national average.
In this context and, as mentioned, with the unknowns related to in the resumption of school and work activities after the holidays, a Swg survey highlights how the concern of Italians and the feeling of being able to contract the Coronavirus has increased significantly.
In particular, 57 percent of citizens are “very worried “Compared with June, the perception of a less dangerous virus is considerably reduced, while immigrants’ fear of contagion increases. As for the masks, by now they have entered so much into people’s daily lives – we read in the survey, carried out on a sample of 800 people a day since June 4 – that 57% of those interviewed admitted wearing them spontaneously .
There is a clear perception of the danger of nightclubs (83%), followed by free beaches (76), private beaches (65), bars and public places (63), hydrofoils, water buses and ferries (49), trains local (44) and restaurants (34%). More reassuring were high-speed trains (considered dangerous only by 27% of the sample) and inside stores (at risk for 15% of those interviewed).
© All rights reserved
