[ad_1]
Substitute rankings: according to the schedule prepared by the Ministry, the School Offices must complete the evaluation of the applications today and guarantee the publication of the lists on September 1. By September 14 (but probably after September 7) the assignment of alternates.
And yet there are numerous reports received from applicants, who have even received a request from the schools to prove the validity of the stated qualifications (while the request did not ask for details of any supplemental CFU or the achievement of 24 CFU in psycho-pedagogical disciplines and teaching methods) when, on the contrary, it corresponds to the Administrations to establish a dialogue based on the statements presented.
To these are added the difficulties reported by the schools and highlighted by FLCGIL “In addition to the difficulties reported by many applicants, theand the schools that are collaborating in the validation of the rankings report numerous failures and errors, especially in the evaluation of services. “
The difficulty lies in the fact that OM does not. The 60/2020 provides for the publication of the rankings in a definitive way only, skipping the step of the provisional ones, which is the one in which through complaints and conversations with applicants the schools manage to order the rankings, correcting a considerable amount of mistakes.
For this reason, the union insists that “it is a criticality denounced several times and a provision that is unprecedented in the rankings of substitutes.
The exclusion of a rectification procedure, with the provision of an adequate period for the presentation of complaints, in addition to being illogical, will give rise to disputes that will fall on the schools, when upon signing the contracts they must carry out the verifications and eventually terminate the Contracts in case of error.
We requested that an integration of OM 60/20 be made immediately with the indication of a short term for the proposal by those who have presented an extrajudicial complaint, also through the same computer platform used for the presentation. some questions.”
One of the dysfunctions that the writing of Orizzonte Scuola has already denounced on time is the case in which the teacher has requested the evaluation of the contemporary service.
To these are added numerous administrative errors that could be resolved through a formal complaint.
[ad_2]
