[ad_1]
The remains found inside the Fiat Panda found on fire in the countryside of Vergonzana, a village in Crema, where the 39-year-old woman lived and who has been missing for two weeks, are said to be Sabrina Beccalli. To support him, after a first announcement by Alessandro Pasini’s lawyer, the accused of voluntary murder and destruction of a corpse, Paolo Sperolini, is now the Cremona prosecutor, which does not completely exclude the possibility that the 45-year-old man has said the truth.
The prosecutor opens the hypothesis: Perhaps the remains of Sabrina in the burned car
According to his version, in fact, Pasini found Sabrina dead and then burned her body along with the car. For greater certainty, the prosecutor Roberto Pellicano asked forensic Cristina Cattaneo to re-examine the bones initially considered by two different veterinarians of a dog. . To have a definitive certainty, the prosecutor Roberto Pellicano asked forensic Cristina Cattaneo this morning the willingness to re-examine the seized bones that were initially believed to be from a dog by two different veterinarians. To do this, you must continue with the DNA test.
Pasini’s lawyer: Among the bones also those of a human being
“Those bones in the cabin of the burning car may very well be Sabrina’s, as my client immediately stated,” said Paolo Sperolini, Alessandro Pasini’s lawyer, echoing the words of the 45-year-old man who repeatedly reiterated his version of the facts also to the investigators. According to the lawyer, however, who said that he had consulted a “first level consultant”, among those remains there would be at least one bone belonging to the human species. It would be a clavicle. Sperolini’s conviction stems from “a tentative evaluation of photographic images” of burned bones found in recent days by the Ris. “My advisor – continued Pasini’s lawyer – had no doubts: at least one of those bones cannot cease to belong to a human being.” Therefore, it would not belong to a dog, as previously established by veterinarians, so Sperolini stresses that this “reinforces the thesis” of his client. However, the lawyer reiterated that “this is a rough initial evaluation” and that he had “informed the prosecutor.”
[ad_2]
