The agrarian controversy of FPI Markaz Syariah Ponpes with PTPN, this is the explanation of experts in agrarian law



[ad_1]

Report by Tribunnews.com journalist Ilham Rian Pratama

TRIBUNNEWS.COM, JAKARTA – The use of an area of ​​30.91 hectares in Megamendung Bogor, West Java, has become controversial. It was the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) and PT Perkebunan Nusantara (PTPN) who were hostile.

The problem is related to the physical use of the land of PTPN VII Kebun Gunung Mas with an area of ​​approximately 30.91 by the Islamic boarding school Markaz Syariah (Ponpes) run by the high imam of the FPI Habib Rizieq Shihab since 2013 without permission and the approval of PTPN VIII.

Read also: PTPN III prepares the integrated irregularity reporting service with KPK

PTPN VII has also submitted a subpoena for FPI regarding the existence of Markaz Syariah Agro-Cultural Ponpes Alam in Megamendung. PTPN indicated that the boarding school is on the grounds of PTPN VIII.

In fact, a subpoena was given to all parties occupying PTPN VIII land in the Gunung Mas plantation area, Puncak, Bogor.

“We hereby inform you that PT Perkebunan Nusantara VIII has drawn up a summons for all occupants in the Gunung Mas plantation area, Puncak,” PTPN Corporate Secretary Naning DT said on Thursday (12/24/2020) .

Read also: PTPN V Goals Related to RSPO Certification in 2022

In the letter, the land under control was said to be an asset of PTPN VII according to HGU certificate No. 299 dated July 4, 2008.

The expert in agrarian law from the University of Andalas, Professor Kurnia Warman, explained that legally if the term of the HGU expires, the land will pass into the hands of the State.

“And state land is effectively an object that will be handed over to natural or legal persons who need it in accordance with the provisions,” Kurnia explained to Tribunnews.com, on Thursday (12/24/2020).

If the HGU were still valid but neglected, Kurnia said, the land would also fall to state lands. He said that land that had been legally state land could no longer be considered an asset.



[ad_2]