/data/photo/2020/12/14/5fd70b274435d.jpg)
[ad_1]
JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com – Strong criticism from the Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI) against the proposed increase in salaries and allowances for DKI Jakarta DPRD members in 2021 is not the first time this has happened.
The party, which was founded in 2014, is known to have voiced various criticisms and rejected the draft budget that was deemed “inconsequential.”
The DKI Jakarta APBD has often been the center of attention and the target of criticism from PSI.
This attitude then leads to action. go out all factions in the DKI DPRD when the PSI faction was about to read its general opinion in a plenary session on Monday (12/14/2020).
Kompas.com summarizes a series of maneuvers carried out by the PSI faction since this party held seats in the DKI Jakarta DPRD. Check out the reviews below:
Fantastic budget Lem Aibon
In October 2019, a member of the A DPRD DKI Jakarta Commission of the ISP faction, William Aditya Sarana, revealed to the public through social media a series of irregularities in the budget proposal in the General Policy of the Priority Budget of the DKI Jakarta (KUA-PPAS) 2020 provisional budget ceiling.
Also read: Cancellation of increase in subsidies for DKI DPRD members ends in resentment against PSI …
First, Wiliam revealed the proposed budget for the West Jakarta Bureau of Education of 82 billion rupees for the acquisition of Aibon glue for the supply of office supplies.
However, this is just one of several other irregularities in the KUA-PPAS DKI Jakarta 2020.
Another thing that also surprised the public and was furious was the disclosure of the 124 billion rupee budget for the purchase of pens at the East Jakarta Region I Education Sub-agency.
In addition, 7,313 computing units and various server units valued at Rs 121 billion were also purchased.
PSI also found a budget of IDR 66 billion for data storage in the Office of Communication, Informatics and Statistics.
As a result of Wiliam’s steps to expose the wrongdoing to the public, he was denounced by a non-governmental organization (NGO) from Maju Kota Bahagia Rakyatnya (Mat Bagan) to the Honorary Board (BK) DPRD DKI Jakarta.
William is considered to be in violation of the code of ethics by discovering the odd budget in the KUA-PPAS draft for the APBD 2020 on his social media.
The Chairman of the DKI DPRD Honorary Council, Achmad Nawawi, said that the KUA-PPAS uploaded by William could be consulted directly with the executive, that is, the DKI Governor, Anies Baswedan, or the head of related services.
Due to his attitude, the DKI DPRD Honorary Board imposed a sanction on William in the form of an oral warning.
Also read: Controversy of salary increase for DKI DPRD, rejection of the PSI faction for another faction Choose to exit
Withdrawal of fees formula E
In the middle of this year, the ISP faction of the Jakarta DPRD urged Governor Anies Baswedan to immediately withdraw the commitment fee that had been paid to Formula E Operations Limited (FEO) worth 560 billion rupees.
The momentum came after the Formula E race did not take place in Jakarta due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Formula E in Jakarta was originally scheduled for June 6, 2020, to be precise in the Monas area of central Jakarta.
The existence of a pandemic has delayed the implementation of this event until 2021.
However, the FIA International Automotive Federation did not list the city of Jakarta as the venue for Formula E 2021 despite the fact that the provincial government of DKI Jakarta has paid a commitment fee for the 2020 season, amounting to 31 million pounds sterling, around Rp 560 billion to licensees.
On one occasion, the head of DKI Jakarta Sports and Youth Service, Achmad Firdaus, said that the payment of the commitment fee will use the revised APBD of 2019.
The Vice Chairman of the Commission E DPRD DKI Jakarta of the ISP faction Anggara Wicitra Sastroamidjojo assessed that the provincial government of DKI Jakarta should not force the implementation of the second tier e-car race to continue in 2021.
Furthermore, he continued, the 2020 APBD had a deficit of Rs 24.72 trillion, from Rs 87.95 trillion to Rs 63.23 trillion, resulting in development programs that could not be implemented.
Read also: [POPULER JABODETABEK] DKI DPRD members retire | Rizieq supporters ask to be detained
Go out scan RKT increase rejection
Eight of the nine factions of the DKI Jakarta DPRD left the plenary meeting room when Idris Ahmad read the general views of the factions on the Draft Regional Regulations on the Amendments to Regional Regulations No. 1 of 2014 on Detailed Spatial Planning and Zoning Regulations.
Action go out This is the result of ISP’s vocal stance against the rejection of the plan to increase DPRD member allocations as outlined in the draft budget for the 2021 DKI Jakarta DPRD Annual Work Plan (RKT).
DKI Jakarta DPRD Vice President Mohamad Taufik said the action go out Eight of the nine factions of the DKI Jakarta DPRD when the ISP Faction read their views as a way of correcting the inconsistent attitude of the ISP.
Previously, the ISP faction was considered to have approved the RKT DPRD DKI project, while party officials at the regional leadership council (DPW) level rejected the plan.
If the ISP faction opinion is not approved by the Jakarta DPW ISP, the other factions say they are not willing to hear the general opinion that will be read out loud.
Also read: Members of the PSI protest strike on wage increase, observer: child
“The votes cast by the members of the PDR of the PSI faction should be in accordance with the votes of the parties and did not change when the increase in allocations in RKT 2021 was discussed,” said Taufik.
In this regard, PSI emphasized that it had never approved the budget increase in 2021 DKI Jakarta DPRD RKT.
A member of the ISP faction DPRD DKI Jakarta Commission A, August Hamonangan, said that the ISP’s legal position was conveyed in the factions overview in the DKI DPRD regarding the RKT budget.
“Although it was mentioned above, there were processes in which our representatives were on the RKT special committee. We reiterate that in the general vision of the Plenary, this is the final result that we reject or do not agree with the increase of RKT ”, said August.
