[ad_1]
Munarman gas again. Habib Rizieq Shihab’s team of lawyers argued against the prosecutor about the need for Habib Rizieq Shihab to be present in the courtroom.
The moment Munarman debated the prosecutor took place during Habib Rizieq’s ongoing trial which was held in the East Jakarta District Court (East Jakarta District Court) on Tuesday (3/23/2021). Munarman initially asked the judge to stay the trial or postpone the trial so that Habib Rizieq would be present at the trial.
“The defendant, as stated at the beginning, the defendant is ready to read his note of exception or objection when he is in this room. So we really beg that they suspend us or postpone us for another day so that we can decide with our heads and hearts. I think that’s the wisest thing to do today, “Munarman said at a trial in the East Jakarta District Court on Tuesday (3/23/2021).
The prosecutor then interrupted. However, Munarman emphasized that it was his turn to speak.
“Wait a minute, Prosecutor, this is my turn, this is my turn, this is my turn. It is quiet. Be orderly, yes, we have been ordered, don’t make it messy,” Munarman said.
Chief Justice Suparman Nyompa tried to calm both parties. He asked the team of legal advisers and the prosecutor to refrain.
“Please refrain, yes, from both sides,” said the judge.
The judge finally decided to postpone the trial to rest, pray and eat.
After going through a rather difficult debate, the judging panel finally agreed to the legal team’s request that Habib Rizieq appear in court. Habib Rizieq’s next rehearsal will be held in person or disconnected.
“He ordered the prosecutor to bring the defendant to trial every day of the trial,” Suparman said.
The panel of judges reversed the judgment of the trial online Rizieq Shihab by stipulation number 221 / Pidsus / 2021. In this way, the next trial of Rizieq Shihab will be held regularly. disconnected.
The judge asked a lawyer to honor the bond that had been presented to him. When it is violated, the execution of the judgment disconnected It will be reviewed.
“If the petitioner violates the declaration of the guarantee letter of March 23, 2021, this determination is reviewed,” the judge said.
