[ad_1]
Jakarta, CNCB Indonesia – The discussion of the labor cluster in the Job Creation Omnibus Bill (Ciptaker) began to be discussed by the government and the Legislative Body of the House of Representatives (Baleg DPR).
Of the 9 factions in the DPR, 5 factions have expressed their position to agree to withdraw the labor group from being included in the Job Creation Bill. Unfortunately, the government insists on continuing to discuss the workforce group on the Omnibus Job Creation Bill.
“Until now, the government continues to request that it be discussed and there are no addresses to withdraw,” explained on Friday (9/25/2020) the Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs, Expert Personnel in Regulation, Law Enforcement and Resilience, Elen Setiadi .
The discussion on the Employment Cluster Ciptaker Bill was discussed for the first time on Friday (9/25/2020) and the meeting was quite difficult. The meeting starts at 7:23 pm until 10:00 pm WIB.
The meeting begins with presenting the background on why the government should include the employment group in the Ciptaker Omnibus Act bill.
The Secretary General of the Ministry of Labor (Kemnaker) Anwar Sanusi explained that issues related to workers or day laborers, job applicants and those affected by layoffs are the main problems that concern the government.
“Of the 3 objects, job seekers, workers and laid off workers get job protection. And we can assure you that the investment will continue to grow and develop with the draft of the revised Bill of Law 13/2003. [tentang Ketenagakerjaan] which is included in the Omnibus Law of the Ciptaker Employment Cluster Bill ”, Anwar explained, on Friday night (9/26/2020).
Then the discussion continued with a detailed discussion by the government on the 10 substances to be discussed in the labor group.
The 10 substances in the labor cluster include general actions or actions that contain the law to be reviewed, the use of foreign workers (TKA), a fixed-time contract (PKWT), subcontracting, work time and rest time . .
Then other substances, namely on wages, layoff (PHK) and severance pay, penalties, job loss guarantees, and other rewards.
Unfortunately, the government did not explain in detail why the 10 substances that should be included in the copyright working group should be addressed. Furthermore, the percentages presented by the government with those obtained by other members of the meeting were different. This then received many interruptions from various Baleg members who attended the meeting.
“It has been postponed for a few days. But it is not entirely clear. What about the Secretary General? We are not united in this way. What about the others? What we have is different,” said a Baleg member.
However, the meeting continued and then the PKWT was immediately discussed, which was explained by the Director General of Labor Inspection and Occupational Safety and Health of the Ministry of Manpower, Haiyani Rumondang.
When looking at the percentage, several members of the baleg delivered the hail of disruptions, because the government did not explain the background why PKWT had to be repaired.
“The sense of urgency of PKWT must be explained first. The fall of PKWT must be like this, there is a change in the industry model, for example. If we know our background it will be easy, if we go straight to the details, we do not know why the answer will change, “Andreas said. Baleg members of the PDIP faction.
After an interruption from Baleg Vice President Willy Aditya, “I don’t see the politics of the problem where. Tetiba was born. 10. We have to imagine what the problem is, we want to go there, projections, where is the politics of the problem. We want to review Law 13 / “. 2003, the crucial point here is to get to that point where we are facing problems like this, so PKWT and TKA must be like this. So it should be, ”he said.
Haiyani from the Ministry of Manpower then outlined, said that the Job Creation Bill regarding the workforce group proposed by his party was believed to add protection for workers.
Not only that, Haiyani said, the comfort of workers, including the purpose of the presence of the investment, which prioritizes the protection of workers.
“In the improvements we propose, we certainly heard various requests from our stakeholders, especially workers. In preparation we will be involved in preparing for the implementation,” Haiyani explained.
