[ad_1]
KOMPAS.com – I Gede Ari Astina aka Jerinx expressed frustration after attending the impeachment hearing at Denpasar District Court on Tuesday (03/11/2020).
Jerinx, defendant in the ITE Act case in the “IDI Kacung WHO” case, was sentenced to three years in prison by the prosecutor.
Also read: The IDI Kacung OMS case, Jerinx is sued for 3 years in prison
In a loud tone, Jerinx questioned the party that wanted to imprison him.
“It’s funny to see it, from IDI Central, IDI Bali, everyone said they didn’t want to imprison me. So who exactly wants to imprison me?” Jerinx said after the trial.
“I want to know who the person is who wants to put me in jail and wants to separate me from my wife,” added Jerinx.
Also read: Jerinx: What is my fault? Do I have the potential to dissolve IDI?
Jerinx then challenged those who wanted to incarcerate him to go to trial.
“Try to come to the court that wants to jail me from time to time. From the IDI Central, IDI Bali nobody wants to jail me. Who really ordered, come to trial,” Jerinx said.
Jerinx, as previously reported, was sentenced to three years in prison in the “IDI Kacung WHO” case.
“He sentenced the defendant I Gede Ary Astina alias Jerinx to three years in prison and a fine of 10 million rupees subsidiary of 3 months in prison,” said prosecutor Otong Hendra Rahayu, in his complaint to the Denpasar District Court, Bali , on Tuesday.
The prosecutor believes that Jerinx has been found guilty of the commission of a crime as stipulated in article 28 paragraph 2 and article 45 paragraph 1 of Law Number 19 of 2016 on Electronic Transaction Information (ITE) in conjunction with article 64 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code.
The prosecutor added that the burdensome thing is that the defendant did not regret his actions and withdrew during the trial.
The defendant’s actions then upset the public and the defendant’s actions hurt the feelings of doctors across Indonesia who handled Covid-19.
Meanwhile, what made things easier for the defendant was that he admitted his actions and that the defendant was still young so there could be guidance.