[ad_1]
After PPKM Volume 1 and 2, today PPKM micro is implemented. This is a sharp and seemingly confusing spotlight. This policy confuses not only the public, but also epidemiologists.
Airlangga University (Unair) Windhu Purnomo public health expert and epidemiologist admitted that this micro PPKM is clearly against scientific principles. Because the evidence is considered to be declining. If the test gets smaller, PPKM should get to the macro.
“Because we don’t know the map, which RTs are safe and unsafe, because the tests are low. Those that are considered low could have a high risk there, but they haven’t been detected. Unlike Hong Kong, they can do micro-tests because the test is high, the test follow-up is higher. The clearer it can be, the more microcapacity, “Windhu said when contacted. detikcom, Tuesday (2/9/2021).
He added that this micro PPKM was deemed too brave. The reason is that testing and tracking is very low and declining.
“We are testing low tracking, how dare you go micro? This is a time bomb. Then people who are considered safe can go out at will. Even though they may be people at risk,” he explained.
Supposedly, Windhu said, PPKM should be returned to the regency / city level without selective logging. All Java-Bali regions must perform PPKM at the district / city level.
Watch the video ‘The full explanation of Micro PPKM governance’:
[Gambas:Video 20detik]