BPN opens voice in land dispute between FPI-PTPN VIII



[ad_1]

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia –

Evaluation of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / National Land Agency (ATR / BPN) Islamic boarding school Agrocultural Sharia Markaz belonging to the Grand Imam of the Islamic Defenders Front (REIT) Rizieq Shihab must return the land in Mega Mendung, Bogor, West Java that is currently in dispute to PT Perkebunan Nusantara VIII (PTPN). This is because the land does not belong to Markaz Syariah but to PTPN.

Spokesperson Teuku Taufiqulhadi relayed this in response to the news of the dispute between the two parties over land at Mega Mendung. According to him, the management rights must be returned because the land owned by PTPN has the status of Business Use Rights (HGU).

“Because it is not the land, then return it to PTPN VIII, because it is the land of PTPN VIII,” Taufiqulhadi told CNNIndonesia.com, Monday (12/28).


In addition, he also denied any claims circulating in the community that the land was already owned by Markaz Syariah because it was the result of buying or operating land from local farmers. According to him, this is not true because the clear state is HGU to PTPN VIII.

“The status is PTPN (BUMN) land. No party can sell and seize land with the permission of the Minister of BUMN or PTPN,” he emphasized.

Previously, PTPN sent a subpoena against Sharia Markaz Ponpes with number SB / 11/6131 / XII / 2020 dated December 18, 2020. PTPN also asked Markaz Syariah to hand over the land no later than seven business days after receive the letter.

“The act of the brother is a criminal act of misappropriation of the right to real property, prohibition of use without right or proxy and / or transfer as regulated in article 385 of the Penal Code, Perpu Number 51 of 1960 and article 480 of the Penal Code “, says the letter.

[Gambas:Video CNN]

Meanwhile, Markaz Syariah’s defense team assessed that the subpoena sent by PTPN VIII was not successful. This statement was obtained by the editorial staff of the General Secretary of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) Munarman.

“Brother’s letter is mistake in person because PTPN VIII should have filed a criminal or civil complaint to the party that sold the land to the Islamic Boarding School or HRS (Habib Rizieq Shihab), because all Village Head officials to the governor knew that Pesantren bought the land from another party that claimed and He explained that the land belongs to him, ”explained the advocacy team.

Meanwhile, the Consortium for Agrarian Reform (KPA) considers that both parties are wrong. According to him, Markaz Syariah was wrong because he controlled lands that did not belong to him. Markaz Syariah also claims to have bought and sold land with farmers, although this did not happen.

“This must address the agrarian issue. Pesantren can also be penalized for controlling state lands. Pesantren cannot use them because they are still HGU and included in BUMN assets,” said KPA general secretary Dewi Kartika.

Meanwhile, PTPN was also wrong because it did not use land with HGU status according to its function, that is, for agricultural, plantation and livestock activities.

“PTPN abandoned their land amid an imbalance in land ownership by the state, although many poor people and small farmers are unable to access the land because it is too controlled by the state. This has led to the emergence of a third party. like this case, “he said.

Furthermore, Dewi stated that this land could not be released without the approval of the Minister of BUMN and PTPN VIII as a recipient of HGU. The land also needs proof of the asset release of the BUMN in question.

(uli / agt)




[ad_2]