[ad_1]
Jakarta, CNN Indonesia –
Chairman of the Executive Board of Students of the University of Indonesia (OK UI), Fajar Adi Nugroho denied that the statement of the position of BEM UI regarding the urgency to revoke the Joint Decree (SKB) 6 heads of institutions / state ministries on the Prohibition of Activities, Use of Symbols and Attributes and Termination of Activities of FPI as a way to support REIT.
He stressed that the BEM UI statement did not justify the dissolution of community organizations without a judicial mechanism.
“So, in yesterday’s liberation, we did not defend the FPI. But the context is that we reject the dissolution of the mass organizations without going through a judicial process,” Fajar told CNNIndonesia.com, Tuesday (5/1).
Fajar stated that his party had never allowed various actions related to disorderly conduct and acts of discrimination by certain parties.
He claimed that this statement only highlighted that dissolving mass organizations without going through the courts did not portray Indonesia as a rule of law.
“Our focus is on the practice of the dissolution of the organization that was stipulated by the SKB decree. This then does not portray Indonesia as a state based on law and upholding legal principles,” he said.
The BEM UI itself issued an attitude statement calling on the government to remove SKB 6 from the heads of government institutions / ministries related to the dissolution of the FPI.
They considered that the procedures and basis for the decision to ban FPI did not reflect Indonesia as the rule of law stipulated in the 1945 Constitution.
“Urge the state to revoke the decree on the prohibition of activities, the use of symbols and attributes and the termination of FPI activities,” reads the statement quoted by BEM UI. CNNIndonesia.com.
[Gambas:Instagram]BEM UI evaluates democracy as one of the 12 principles of the rule of law. According to him, the laws and regulations that apply cannot be applied unilaterally by and / or only for the benefit of the authorities. Because it is contrary to the principles of democracy.
The legal process, said BEM UI, must be able to guarantee the interests of a sense of justice for all without exception.
“They condemn all acts of dissolution of social organizations by the State without a judicial process according to what is contained in the Law of Organization of the Masses,” the statement read.
Not only that, BEM UI also demanded that the police chief’s information on compliance with the activity ban, the use of symbols and attributes, and the termination of FPI activities be revoked.
They consider this rule to be a separate problem because point 2d contains the prohibition of accessing, uploading and disseminating FPI-related content through social networks. In fact, they said, accessing Internet content is part of the right to information guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and article 14 of the Human Rights Law.
“The edict a quo of the Chief of Police, of course, will be used by law enforcement officers to carry out repressive and silencing actions, especially in the electronic sphere,” he said.
Seeing these problems, BEM UI urged the government not to use repressive and arbitrary methods in the future.
BEM UI also encourages citizens to participate in monitoring the implementation of the principles of the rule of law, especially the protection of human rights and the guarantee of democracy by the State,
“They condemn the suppression of democracy and efforts to violate human rights as part of the principles of the rule of law,” the statement said.
The government officially announced the FPI as a banned organization through the SKB of six high-ranking ministry / agency officials on December 30. The government now prohibits all activities and use of the FPI symbol on Indonesian territory.
It is known that, after being dissolved by the government, the FPI changed its name to the Islamic Association Front. There are 19 statements from the Islamic Association Front that oppose the dissolution of the FPI.
(rzr / psp)
[ad_2]
