FPI changed its name as head of the Islamic Association

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia –

Several figures declared the United Islamic Front after the Islamic Defenders Front (REIT) declared a banned organization.

FPI President Shabri Lubis and FPI Secretary Munarman were among those who declared the new association.

It is said that the Declaration of the Islamic Union Front was made to continue the fighting movement to defend the religion, the nation and the country of Indonesia in accordance with Pancasila and the Constitution of 1945.

“To all administrators, members and supporters of the Islamic Defenders Front in Indonesia and abroad, in order to avoid unnecessary things and clashes with the dzalim regime, we declare to the Islamic United Front to continue the struggle to defend religion, nation and the state of Pancasila and the Constitution of 1945 ”, said the declarant of the Islamic United Front, Abu Fihir Alattas in his official statement, on Wednesday (12/30).

Abu assessed that the Joint Decree of 6 leaders of the State Ministries / Institutions against the dissolution of the FPI had violated the constitution and was against the law. The reason is that the Joint Decree does not have legal force both in terms of legality and legitimacy.

“We see it as a form of diversion and obstruction of justice (obstruction of the search for justice) to the murder of 6 members of the Islamic Defenders Front and a manifest form of cruelty towards the people,” he said.

Meanwhile, there are 18 names of the declarators who founded the Islamic United Front. In addition to Abu, there are names of former FPI President Ahmad Shabri Lubis and former FPI Secretary General Munarman.

Other filers are Awit Mashuri Haris Ubaidillah, Idrus Al Habsyi, Idrus Hasa, n, Ali Alattas, Ali Alattas, I Tuankota Basalamah, Habib Syafiq Alaydrus, Baharuzaman, Amir Ortega, Syahroji, Waluyo, Joko

Then there is the name of Luthfi, Habib Abu Fihir Alattas, Tb. Abdurrahman Anwar and Abdul Qadir Aka.

The coordinating minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs, Mahfud Md, described the FPI as a prohibited organization and it no longer has a legal position either as a mass organization or as an ordinary organization.

There are at least six reasons underlying the ban, including the maintenance of the existence of ideology and state consensus, the content of the FPI statutes is considered contrary to the Orms Law, the FPI is said to have not extended its Certificate of Registration as Ormas and, several officials and members of the FPI are involved in terrorism and other criminal acts. .

Based on this decision, the FPI legal team considered the legal steps. Currently, the evaluation process is underway. A possible legal remedy is to challenge the verdict in the State Administrative Court (PTUN). FPI also immediately opened the opportunity to change its name.

(rzr / on)