[ad_1]
LIVE – Reporting to the Secretary General of the Habib Rizieq Shihab Center (HRS), Haikal Hassan to Polda Metro Jaya remains controversial. The report was considered strange because Haikal said that he had met Rasulullah SAW in a dream.
In an event Two faces tv, this topic is discussed with the title ‘When dreams threaten Bui ‘. The representatives of the reporters of the Islamic Struggle Forum, namely Muhammad Rofi’i Rofiq or Gus Rofiq attended as speakers. From the Haikal Hassan camp, there is his lawyer, Abdullah Alkatiri.
At the beginning of the discussion, Gus Rofi’i had the opportunity to explain the reasons why his party was monitoring Haikal. He stressed that the 212 Alumni Brotherhood (PA) spokesperson statement was delivered at the funeral of 5 FPI laskar in Megamendung, West Java, some time ago.
“Nah, our duty as Muslims is only to pray munajat to Allah. Without justifying, without verifying that this is sahid, that this is with Rasulullah, that is not allowed. It is the duty of Allah. They are not our rights as humans. The only job of a human being is to pray, “said Gus Rofi’i. LIVE on Saturday, December 19, 2020.
He referred to the scholars’ agreement that painting or depicting the face of the Prophet is prohibited. So no one knows the face of the Prophet.
“I am sure that Ustaz Haikal did not meet with Rasulullah. That is why I demanded that Ustaz Haikal demonstrate in court what Rasulullah’s character and face are like. And that is difficult,” Rofi’i explained.
He said that according to the understanding of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) ulama, if you dream of meeting the Prophet, it is enough to save him and you do not need to announce it in public. “I’m afraid of what, fear raises pros and cons I see. So is, “he said.
“Furthermore, it is reported that the deceased who knew Rasulullah was said to be jihad. Is it against jihad that law enforcement is jihad?” he said.
Responding to Gus Rofi’i, it was Haikal’s lawyer, Abdullah Alkatiri, who spoke. He stressed that the reporter’s account concluded that the interested party did not understand the law.
“From the history of the reporter’s evidence, are you the reporter? This does not understand the law. Because if there is law there must be evidence,” Abdullah said.
In addition to the existence of evidence, it must refer to facts. He stressed that what is meant by lies in Haikal’s dreams is difficult to prove.
“I returned the question. What lies, where is the lie?” Abdullah said.
He was also surprised that his client was accused of spreading false news that could cause a commotion or confusion referred to in article 28 paragraph 2 of the ITE Law and article 156 letter a of the Penal Code and article 14 and article 15 of the Law 1/1946 of Criminal Regulations.
“What disorder? No confusion. How can you interpret someone’s dream? This is also strange. In fact, dreams are very subjective. In fact, they are doctrines,” Abdullah added.
He added that the Messenger of Allah in a hadith once said that if people dream of my face, that is me.
“That is me, why, because the Messenger of Allah cannot be imitated by other creatures. Even dreams are allowed by Rasulullah,” Abdullah explained.
Also read: Haikal Hassan polished for a dream, refly: the law must have measures
