Giving different information and interrupting when asked, the prosecutor reprimands prosecutor Pinangki

JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com – The judge admonished the behavior of lawyer Pinangki Sirna Malasari because it was found that he often interrupted when questioned and gave different statements in court.

“In your testimony, you laugh, this is related to the authority of the court, you have not been asked, you are always criticizing,” said Panel of Judges Agus Salim at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Wednesday (12/16) / 2020). Between.

In this trial, Pinangki testified on behalf of the defendant Andi Irfan Jaya in the trial of alleged corruption cases related to the management of fatwa in the Supreme Court (MA). Meanwhile, Pinangki was also charged in the same case.

Also read: Lawyer Pinangki claims he wants to execute Djoko Tjandra, but does not inform superiors of his meeting

Pinangki then apologized and thanked the jury. Later, Judge Agus returned to advise Pinangki.

“It happens many times, do not interrupt if they do not ask you, if there is something that is not right, show what is not right. Their statements continue to vary in court, please all of us work for the state, respect this work, “said Judge Agus Salim. .

“I’m sorry Major. Thank you for reminding you,” Pinangki replied.

He later admitted that he was not concentrating when giving information for the investigation report (BAP).

Also read: Prosecutor Pinangki recognizes absenteeism to go to Singapore and Malaysia

Therefore, Pinangki, who actually knew that Djoko Tjandra was the convict when they met in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia on November 12, 2019, answered the opposite in the BAP.

“I went to Kuala Lumpur, actually I already knew that Djoko Tjandra was the convict, Your Honor. I have known since October 2019,” Pinangki said.

Prosecutor Pinangki then began to cry.

He revealed that his life was ruined when he was caught in the case.

“I was detained for a legal logic that in my opinion cannot be explained, they detained me and I had to separate from my son, so I only signed my BAP, I refused to be examined by Bareskrim, my life was destroyed at that time”, Pinangki said.

Also read: Doctors reveal that the cost of care for Pinangki’s lawyer reaches 100 million rupees per year

When examined by investigators, Pinangki admitted that he was still crying and thought about how the process could be completed quickly.

According to him, the title of doctor of law or the position of prosecutor that he occupies does not mean when he is separated from the child.

“It doesn’t make sense if you get separated from a child, a doctor of law or a prosecutor or a lecturer, but I am a mother who has never separated from my son,” Pinangki half-yelled.

In this case, Andi Irfan Jaya was accused of negotiating a bribe from Djoko Tjandra to the prosecutor Pinangki Sirna Malasari.

The bribe was allegedly given to administer a fatwa in the Supreme Court so that Djoko Tjandra would not be executed in the transfer of collection corruption case. (assignment) Bank Bali.

Meanwhile, Pinangki was accused of accepting US $ 500,000 from Djoko Tjandra, for committing the crime of money laundering (TPPU) and conspiracy.