[ad_1]
One of the articles charged by FPI leader Habib Rizieq Shihab in the case of a crowd in Petamburan, central Jakarta, was Article 160 of the Penal Code on Sedition. Habib Rizieq’s lawyer was surprised that the police were suspicious of this article.
In investigations conducted by investigators on December 12, it was claimed that HRS was arrested and declared a suspect not only by article 93 of the Sanitary Quarantine Law, but also by article 160 of the Penal Code for his actions, ‘inciting to people to gather ‘or’ creating a crowd at his residence in with his son’s wedding ceremony and the birthday of the Great Prophet Muhammad SAW, “said FPI Legal Assistance Team Leader Sugito Atmo when contacted detikcom, Sunday (12/13/2020).
Sugito said that the imposition of the incitement article tended to be imposing. Given, according to Sugito, from the beginning Habib Rizieq was summoned by the police regarding the crowd on the birthday of Prophet Muhammad SAW and the wedding of his daughter.
“This is where it is true that someone thinks that the use of criminal articles against HRS is an alias ‘really maximum’,“he said.
It considered that article 160 of the Penal Code was a material offense. For this reason, investigators must prove the consequences of these criminal elements.
“It’s like that when it comes to incitement 160, right now, it’s a material offense, not a formal offense. For example, he instigated an attack. Inciting a fire, there was a fire. Just this, if the (hit) 160 incitement, that’s the scale of material offense, not offense. For example, incited to attack, there was an attack. Incited to burn, there was arson. The crime was proven in the constitutional court. So it became interesting when there was an activity in Habib Rizieq Shihab, “he said.
In this copy, HRS was charged with Article 216 of the Penal Code in connection with efforts to obstruct officers. Sugito also questioned the imposition of this article.
“So we are considered to be friends as if he was blocking the officers. What officers? Our people invite implementation to comply with health protocols, ”he said.
In Article 216 of the Penal Code, the police also suspect that HRS deliberately failed to comply with existing orders or requests. The legal team suspected this was related to the activities that the crowd sparked.
“I have not received a detailed explanation yet, but I have a strong suspicion that they did not comply with the mandates of the law, because there were activities that brought together many people during the PSBB,” he explained.
How is the explanation about the alleged article to Habib Rizieq. Listen on the next page.
